My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC12543
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSPC12543
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:47 PM
Creation date
8/2/2007 3:02:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.102.01.K
Description
CO River Basin Water Projects - Aspinall Unit - General - Section 7 Consultation-Biological Opinion
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/1/2001
Author
DOI-BOR
Title
Gunnison Basin Water Demand Study - Estimate of New Depletions for the Period 2000-2050 - Draft - RE-Gunnison PBO and Related Issues - 04-01-01
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Data
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0010 8 ~ <br /> <br />· Exports of water from the lower basin to supply the city of Grand Junction were <br />estimated by city staff, These exports will be a 100% depletion from the basin. <br /> <br />Methodology for Mining, Snowmaking, BLM Stock ponds: <br /> <br />· The estimate of additional mining use was taken. from: <br />· For the Upper Basin: The only identified increase is likely to come from the <br />Mount Emmons area near Crested Butte. A 1997 report by W,H. Wheeler <br />estimated 1,530 acre-feet of additional depletion. <br /> <br />· For the. Middle Basin: awaiting info from the BLM/USFS EIS on future North <br />Fork coal mining development. <br /> <br />· The estimate of additional snowmaking is based on a master development plan for <br />. Cres~ed Butte's expansion to Snodgrass mountain, This document estimated an annual <br />21.3 af depletion, <br /> <br />· The estimate of BLM stock pond depletions was derived from 6 historical years (1995 - <br />2000) of stock pond and spring development projects, The total new depletions reported <br />over those 6 years were used to develop an average annual value which were multiplied <br />by 50 years to arrive at a total figure of 400 acre-feet for the entire basin. This value was <br />equally distributed into the 3 sub-basin for purposes of this study. <br /> <br />Anticipated Refinements yet to be completedfor this study: <br /> <br />· In order to better estimate of the percent of county population in each sub-basin, analyze <br />the demographers information on total county population vs urban areas; verify estimates <br />with appropriate c()u~typ!'!I1I].ers,_' (See metl,1()d"in .J:IeJton.& WilliamS~(lreport) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Cuntal;t SEO for estimates of stock or other pond depledons. Determine if these and <br />BLM numbers really reflect new depletions or are just replaCing old ones, i.e., is the <br />. livestock population growing creating additional stockwatering needs? <br /> <br />· Review the variation in amount of per capita use in various geographic areas to determine <br />whether area-specific values should be used, Obtain monthly distribution values from <br />other M&I water suppliers and for other categories of water use. <br /> <br />· Adjust population projections for seasonal fluctuations (e.g., use 25% in some locales- <br />number from East River area 201 studies).. . <br /> <br />Other possible refinements: <br />· Assume growth rates other the state demographers' numbers, <br /> <br />Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.