WSPC12529 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

000429 IV. Whether during the construction of the RICO structures, the constrnction may cause material injury to the ISF or the naturaI environment that the ISF protects. v. TU and Denver Water recommend addinl! a factor as follows: whether a prouosed mCD water riebt would result in unnaturallv hieh flows (or sienificant fluctuations in flow) that would damaee the natural environment] e. Whether the adjudication and administration of the RleD would promote--maximum utilization of the waters of the State. The Board, in making this finding. may consider, but is not limited to, the following: i. Whether there are any probable future upstream junior appropriations for direct diversion or storage;rThe Upper Gunnison River Water ConservancY District sueeests this rule should be deleted or moved to Rule 7.a) n. Whether there are any probable future changes, transfers, or exchanges of water rights from points of diversion downstream of the reach affected by the RICO to points upstream of or in the reach affected by the RICD;rThe Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District sueeests this rule should be deleted or moved to Rule 7.a) iii. Whether existing federal policies, regulations and laws affect or will be affected by the RICD. IV. Whether a reasonable means is to be utilized to use, div~ capture and control the water for a RICD so as to minimi7,c its call upon the river and avoid waste; rTU sueeests this rule is imuroperUPueblo West sueecsts addine recirculation systems be added to this subfactor' v. Whether it. reasonable demand exists for the recreational activity in question as determined by levels of current use and/or estimates of future use; vi. Whether the application has appropriate limitations upon the time of day, days per month, or seasons during which the RICD would be exercised; rThe Upper Gunnison River Water ConservancY District sueeests this rule should be deleted or moved to Rule 7.a) Vll. The depth and flow rate of the proposed RICD; Vlll. With what frequency and duration the requested amounts of water for the RICO occur; and, fli.:.ix The eeoooRHe effeet oCtile pmpasetl RICD.ITU. Denver Water. the UUDer Gunnison River Water Conservanev District. Steamboat and Chaffee County consortium recommend keeDine this (economic effect) factor.] Whether the requested RICD flow rates exceed the averae:e flow rate for each time oeriod reauested: (Pueblo suel!ests the new rule eoes beyond the ewCR's authority) Xl. Whether the requested RICD is for 8DDl'Opriate times of day and an aDproDriate season of use: 'Pueblo and the Uuoer Gunnison River Water Conservancy District sueeest this rule e0e8 beyond the CWCB's authoritvUSouthwestem sueeests that this reDeats Rule 7.e.vil xii. The amount of water claimed: Xlll. The effect on other uses of the amount of water claimed: and. (The UUDer Gunnison River Water Conservancy Distriet SD~Pesb this rule e0e8 beyond the CWCB's authority 9