My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ISFAPPC01496
CWCB
>
Instream Flow Appropriations
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
ISFAPPC01496
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2017 2:25:31 PM
Creation date
8/2/2007 1:17:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Instream Flow Appropriations
Case Number
02CW0276
Stream Name
Royer Gulch
Watershed
San Miguel River
Water Division
4
Water District
60
County
San Miguel
Instream Flow App - Doc Type
Supplemental Data
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />II <br />ell <br />'i <br /> <br />el <br />" <br />" <br />:1 <br />:i <br />I <br /> <br />'I <br />'I <br />I <br />II <br />'I <br />'I <br />e <br />I <br />,I <br /> <br />riparian community. The geology of the Telluride area is unique in that the water of many the <br />San Miguel's tributary streams have extremely low conductivity; in other words, the water <br />quality of nearly all of the San Miguel's tributary streams is extremely pure - pure to the point <br />that electro fishing is not possible with standard electro fishing equipment. Fish may exist in <br />these streams but they are not readily sampled with standard electro fishing gear. The CDOW <br />believes that the lower reaches of these streams are used by fish that are residents of the <br />mainstem San Miguel River and are important to the San Miguel's fish community during some <br />periods of the year (i.e. spawning, rearing, and refugia from high flow events). CD OW also <br />believes that the high quality water that is produced by the tributary streams is extremely <br />important to the impaired water quality of the San Miguel River. Mine drainage into the San <br />Miguel River and mill tailing piles adjacent to the river are currently being cleaned up as a result <br />of comprehensive reclamation effort above the Town of Telluride. Dissolved levels of heavy <br />metals in the San Miguel River continue to be a problem fix the river's fishery but conditions are <br />improving; the high quality water from tributary streams such as Royer Gulch are vital to the <br />continued improvement of water quality and the San Miguel's fish population. <br /> <br />Field Survey Data <br /> <br />CDOW and CWCB staff used the R2Cross methodology to quantify the amount of water <br />required to preserve the natural environment to a reasonable degree. The R2Cross method <br />requires that stream discharge and channel profile data be collected in a riffle stream habitat type. <br />Riffles are most easily visualized as the stream habitat types that would dry up first should <br />streamflow cease. This type of hydraulic data collection consists of setting up a transect, <br />surveying the stream channel geometry, and measuring the stream discharge. Appendix B <br />contains copies of field data collected for this proposed segment. <br /> <br />Biological Flow Recommendations <br /> <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />output from the R2Cross data collected to develop the initial, biologic instream flow <br />recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic <br />requirements of each stream without regard to water availability. Three instream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity, are used to develop <br />biologic instream flow recommendations. The CDOW has determined that maintaining these <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996). <br /> <br />For this segment of stream, one data set was collected with the results shown in Table 1 below. <br />Table 1 shows who collected the data (Party), the date the data was collected (Date), the <br />measured discharge at the time of the survey (Q), the accuracy range of the predicted flows <br />based on Manning Equation (240% and 40% of Q), the summer flow recommendation based on <br />meeting 3 of 3 hydraulic criteria and the winter flow recommendation based upon 2 of 3 <br />hydraulic criteria. <br /> <br />Table 1: Data <br />Party <br />DOW /CWCB <br /> <br />250%-40% I Summer (3/3) I <br />1.3 - 0.2 2.7(1) <br /> <br />CWCB = Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />? = Criteria never met in RlCROSS Staging Table. <br /> <br />Date <br />10/08/96 <br /> <br />Q <br />0.53 <br /> <br />Winter (2/3) <br />1.3 <br /> <br />BLM - Bureau of Land Management DOW = Division of Wildlife <br />(I) Predicted flow outside of the accuracy range of Manning's Equation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.