My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12593
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12593
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:42 PM
Creation date
8/2/2007 8:23:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8282.500.20
Description
CO River Operations-Accounting - Long Range Reservoir Operation-Annual Operations Studies
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
10/3/1984
Author
Unknown
Title
1984 Colorado River Operation Study Report - Preliminary and Reviewed Draft - 10-03-84
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />U02829 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I' <br />\ III '\,"~, ()l>t''''.: 1\ <br />~y,~ W:' \.' . <br />The sum of^releases must equal or exceed 8.23 million acre-feet per year. <br /> <br />During the last 7 months of the year, the releases are dictated mainly <br />by the goal of balancing storage space between Lake Mead and Lake <br /> <br />Powell, subject, of course, to the restrictions just noted. <br /> <br />~toV <br />The simplified seasonal model was run using the sam~~hydrologic tra- <br />",~:p.( \\.c.\,;:'\ ' ,.' , <br />:>" -' >. y. ...... <br />ces as were used in theACRSS analyses. Results were a~yzed to deter- <br /> <br />mine which strategies (if any) would produce unacceptable results with <br /> <br />respect to operational constraints on the system. Several parameters <br /> <br />were evaluated on a strategy-by-strategy basis. These included monthly <br /> <br />and annual releases from Lakes Powell and Mead, end of study contents <br /> <br />for Lakes Powell and Mead, power generation, and diversions by CAP and <br /> <br />MWD. <br /> <br />Results were favorable, generally indicating that operating strategies <br /> <br />in the range, of 0.70 to 0.99 coul d be run wi thout encounteri ng seri ou~ <br />problems in the river system and with generally more favorable results <br /> <br />than observed in the base case. <br /> <br />3.5 Description of Changes in CRSS Logic <br /> <br />tJo. -vI- ~-~ Je.ft..1\s. <br />4~f'-,...J <br /> <br />I Y\ se.r--".... te.. O-FP....J Ii.) <br /> <br />In order to incorporate the capability for considering alternative <br />strategies, significant changes in the CRSS code were necessary. <br /> <br />, , <br />{ . --." <br /> <br />, <br />1,'... <br />......-" <br /> <br />.-- <br /> <br />E\ <br /> <br />The revised code includes code to simulate the alternative strategies as <br />described earlier.ft;t~me minor refinement~~~~de as a result of experi- <br />ence in running the ANNSIM and MONSIM models and general discussions. <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.