My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Northglenn_WCPlan_Approval
CWCB
>
Water Efficiency Grants
>
Day Forward
>
Northglenn_WCPlan_Approval
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2012 4:07:42 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 2:32:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Efficiency Grants
Water Efficiency Grant Type
Water Conservation Implementation Grant
Contract/PO #
OE PDA 07-23
Applicant
City of Northglenn
Project Name
City of Northglenn Water Conservation Plan
Title
Water Conservation Plan Approval Letter
Date
7/23/2007
County
Adams
Weld
Water Efficiency - Doc Type
Approval Letter
Document Relationships
Northglenn_WCPlan2008
(Message)
Path:
\Water Conservation\DayForward
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Required Conservation Plan Elements Completed? <br /> measure. The recently adopted IW AI A WW A water loss <br /> audit methodology is proving to be an excellent method for <br /> utilities to evaluate water loss and to develop a rational <br /> plan of action. State grant funds may be available for such <br /> an effort. <br /> VI. Information, public education, audits, Yes ~ No <br /> demos? Comment: <br /> VII. Conservation oriented rate structure Yes ~ No <br /> and billing system? Comment: <br /> VIII. Regulatory measures designed to Yes ~ No <br /> encourage water conservation? Comment: <br /> IX. Incentives, rebates to encourage Yes ~ No <br /> conservation implementation? Comment: <br />8. Role of water conservation plan in overall Yes ~ No <br /> water supply planning? Comment: <br />9. Steps to implement, monitor, review, and Yes ~ No <br /> revise conservation plan including time Comment: <br /> period not to exceed 7 years? <br />10. Estimates of water saved through previous Yes ~ No <br /> conservation efforts AND water saved Comment: Goal of 600 AF savings represents about 8.7% <br /> through plan implementation? of current demand and presumably less of future demand. <br /> The goal is further reduced because 122 AF (of the 600) <br /> have already been conserved by existing measures. While <br /> an acceptable goal, this amount is not particularly <br /> impressive and can likely be easily achieved with less <br /> effort than the measures outlined in the plan. <br /> <br />Plan Review Findings <br /> <br />~ Approved <br /> <br />Conditional Approval <br /> <br />Disapproval with Modifications <br /> <br />Plan review comments: <br />Northglenn and Hydrosphere have put together an exemplary plan. It is well organized, detailed, <br />and covers all of the required planning elements specified in the statute. This plan meets and <br />exceeds the states requirements. <br /> <br />The only disappointment with this plan is the rather unimpressive conservation goal of 600 AF <br />of savings (of which 122 AF has already been conserved). This appears to be a rather low <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.