My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12584
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12584
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:40 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 2:14:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.21
Description
Colorado River Basin Threatened and Endangered Species - UCRBRIP - Hatchery Facilities
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
9/1/1992
Author
CWCB
Title
State of Colorado Hatchery Feasibility Study for Endangered Fishes of the Colorado River Basin - Edited Drafts-With Status of Study Tasks and Schedules - 09-01-92
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001881 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Development of the data sheet and site screening methodology was based upon technl~ J ~ ') <br />issues related to biological, engineering and operational considerations. No. I-technical ~ ",ij <br />, es 10' . " - ff mic L1"/ iO <br />d velo t bene' 0 tourism . were citical nd were nQiJ ~:~ <br />in lu d in pe of t Ibility st ~~ <br /> <br />The general site selection criteria and screening factors were: water source, flow rate, <br />water quali . sical characteristics, biological considerations, location~ors, and <br />e es ima!ed co~t ra~ge ~the hatcli. ~. ~ ~Ae.. <br /> <br />The initialiscreening methodology was originally to based on applying a numerical <br />rating to each of the general site selection criteri ctors described above, using the data <br />obtained from the data sheet and other r s. Due to incomplete or unavailable data, <br />it>-was determined that.application of the numeriCal rating criteria for the task was not <br />feasible a . Rather, each of the sites w s objectively reviewed and <br />evaluateCi, based 'on criteria. Using 'this <br />methodology, ttie original 33 sites we screened to 16, 'and are listed in Table 2. <br /> <br /> <br />TABLE 2 <br />~oJL. <br />STUDY SITE LIST FOllOWING THE INITIAL SCREENING <br /> <br />Site 10 Site Name and location <br /> <br />1. Glenwood Desalinization Facility (near Glenwood Springs, CO) <br />2. CO-Ute Plant/CIRG Site (near Craig, CO) <br />6. Rifle Falls SFH (near Rifle, CO) <br />8. Clines Fish Hatchery (Monte Vista, CO) <br />9. Putnam Fish Hatchery (Durango, CO) <br />10. Silver Springs Trout Farm (Montrose, CO) <br />11. McMillan's Trout Farm (Hotchkiss, CO) <br />15. Crystal Properties (near Hooper, CO) <br />16. Horsethief Site (near Grand Junction, CO) <br />18. Walter Walker State Wildlife Area (Grand Junction, CO) <br />23. Rangeview Trout Ranch (Saguache, CO) <br />24. John Stroh (near Hotchkiss, CO) <br />25. Russell Lakes SWA (Saguache, CO) <br />26. Closed Basin Project (near San Luis Lake, CO) <br />28~ New Wastewater Treatment Plant (near Craig, CO) <br />32. Grand Junction Site #1 (Summerville Ranch, CO) <br /> <br />CWCBl.ES <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.