Laserfiche WebLink
<br />09/04/92 <br /> <br />13:42 <br /> <br />URS CONSULTRNT DENUER <br /> <br />008 <br /> <br />/' 001844 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />would not be ranked and the study will better provide the cwes and Recovery Program <br />::'\h.~,~WJ~. faCility design and costs, regardless of the location. <br /> <br />,,:,/:~::r~.'" .. TABLE 3 / <br /> <br />RATING FACTOR CATEGORIES <br /> <br />Factor Cateaorv Maximum Points <br /> <br />Water Source 25 <br />Water Quality 20 ~ <br />Site Physical 20 <br />Biological Considerations 15 ~. ~ <br />Locatlonal Factors 10 ~~ <br />Probable Cost 10 ( ~lfj , <br /> <br />Th source an quality of the ~ater supply were determined J.o be the most Important <br />fact rs In selecti a hatchery site and were wel hted the hlg.nest maximum point value. <br /> <br />l\J. <br /> <br /> <br />,.,-- <br /> <br />HATCHERY DESIGN Z, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />7 <br />