My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12582
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12582
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:40 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 1:18:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.200.05
Description
Colorado River - Water Projects - Other Supply Projects - Hoover Dam-Lake Meade-Boulder Canyon
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1982
Author
Keith W Kroese
Title
Legal Aspects of the Upcoming Reallocation of Hoover Dam Energy - The Conflict Between Arizona-California and Nevada - Keith W Kroese - Arizona Law Review-Volume 24 - 01-01-82
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />001530 <br /> <br /> <br />934 <br /> <br />ARIZONA LAW REVIEW <br /> <br />[VoL 24, <br /> <br />Although mandatory on its far.e, the right of contract renewal may be <br />,subject to the Secretary's discretion. Section 617d(b) provides that renew_ <br />als shall be granted upon "such terms and conditions as may be authorized <br />or required under the then existing laws and regulations."49 Section 617d <br />requires the Secretary to prescribe "general and uniform regulations. . . <br />for renewals" granted under section 617d(b).5o Therefore, renewals of <br />power contracts may be subject to secretarial discretion as expressed in the <br />regulations. In prescribing those regulations, the Secretary may well have <br />the option of reducing the amount of power available under the contracts <br />being renewed.Sl <br />Section 617d(c) of the BCPA is the preference clause that has CODle <br />into conflict with the renewal clause because of the original power alloca- <br />tion.52 That section, which Nevada and Arizona construe as granting each <br />state an absolute right to one-third of the Hoover power,53 provides that <br />the Secretary shall resolve conflicting applications in accordance with the <br />public interest and with the policy expressed in the Federal Power Act It <br />grants, however, a special preference to the states of Arizona, ,California. <br />and Nevada, awarding them a right over all other applicants to purchase <br />electric energy for use in the state. 54 The clause operates to grant states <br />and municipalities a priority in the contracting process by its reference to <br />the Federal Power ACt.55 Because of this incorporation of the Federal <br />Power Act's policy, the BCP A provides that in the case of conflicting appli- <br />cations deemed equally well-adapted to conserve and utilize the project <br />resources in the public interest, the contract shall be awarded to the public <br />entity applying for the power.56 On its face, therefore, the BCPA prefer- <br /> <br /> <br />100.000 firm horsepower under a contract must permit another agency receiving less than 25,000 <br />firm horsepower to use its transmission lines, , _ <br />49. 43 U.S.C. ti 617d(b) (1976). <br />50. Id ti 617d. <br />51. See Yuma-Mesa Irrig. &'Drainage Disl. v. Udall, 253 F. Supp. 909, 912 (D.D,C. 1965) <br />(Secretary had statutory authority to reduce amount of water available to an irrigation district <br />holding a water contract during a time of drought). <br />52. See supra notes 22-35 and accompanying text <br />53. See Nevada Brief, supra note 8, at 71; infra notes 70-94 and accompanying texL <br />54. 43 U.S.C. ti 617d(c) (1976) provides that: <br />In case of conflicting applications, if any, such Conflicts shall be resolved by the said <br />Secretary, after hearing. with due regard to the public interest, and in conformity with <br />the policy expressed in the Federal Power Act as to conflicting applications for permits <br />and licenses, ~xcept that preference to applicants for the use of water and appurtenant <br />works and privileges necessary for the generation and distribution of hydroelectric en- <br />ergy, or for delivery at the switchboard of a hydroelectric plant, shall be given, first, to a <br />State for the generation or purchase of electric energy for use in the State, and the States <br />of Arizona, California, and Nevada shall be given equal opportunity as such applicants. <br />55. See 16 U.S.C. ~ 800(a) (1976) which provides: ' <br />In issuing preliminary permits hereunder or licenses where no preliminary permit <br />has been issued and in issuing licenses to new licensees under section 808 of this title the <br />Commission shall give preference to applications 'therefor by States and municipalities, <br />provided the plans for the same are deemed by the CommissIOn equally well adapted, or <br />shall within a reasonable time to be fixed by the Commission be made equally well <br />adapted, to conserve and utilize in the public interest the water resources of the region; <br />and as between other applicants, the Commission may give preference to the applicant <br />the plans of which it finds and determines are best adapted to develop, conserve, and <br />utilize in the public interest the water resources of the region, if it be'satisfied as to the <br />ability of the applicant to carry out such plans. <br />56. See 43 U.S.C. ~ 617d(c) (1976). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.