My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12578
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12578
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:39 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 8:43:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Basin - Legislation-Law - Compacts - Colorado River Compact
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
7/1/1986
Author
John U Carlson - Alan E Boles Jr
Title
Contrary Views of the Law of the Colorado River - An Examination of Rivalries Between the Upper and Lower Basins - John U Carlson and Alan E Boles Jr - 07-01-86
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001476 <br /> <br />the fact that you have a permanent guaranty of 7,500,000 <br /> <br />acre-feet?"133 The intended equality of the Upper Basin and <br /> <br />Lower Basin apportionment was remarked upon by Hoover as <br /> <br />follows: <br /> <br />Now, one of the fundamental things in safe- <br />guarding the proper normal development of the <br />basin is the principle of what we have designated, <br />for lack of a better term, equation. I think that <br />principle is proper because, if we did not have it, <br />we simply would have a race between the upper basin <br />and lower basin for accumulation of appropriation <br />rights. And if we can decide on the principles <br />first, that we thrust the equitable division of the <br />river on some future period, second, that we <br />temporarily establish some basis of maximum, and <br />third, that we :establish the principle of equa- <br />tion, we reduce the entire problem to one, i.e., <br />the solution of the maximum.134 <br /> <br />stephen Davis also suggested that the II idea of an equation <br />between the two divisions" undergirded the Compact.13S <br /> <br />As Hoover indicated, a corollary of the principle of <br /> <br />equation, or equality, was that the amount of water appor- <br /> <br />tioned to each Basin be adequate to accommodate its present <br /> <br />and future needs and to protect it from the affects of the <br /> <br />development of the other Basin. <br /> <br />In this vein Carpenter <br /> <br />declared: <br /> <br />The whole theory of the compact is this: That the <br />water apportioned to each basin is adequate not <br />only for its present uses, but for the increase of <br />development within each basin.136 <br /> <br />Hoover also remarked: <br /> <br />... we make now, for lack of a better word I may <br />call a temporary equitable division, reserving a <br />certain portion of the flow of the river to the <br />hand of those men who may come after us, ... that <br />they can make a further division of the river at <br />such time, and in the meantime we shall take such <br /> <br />-51- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.