My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12578
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12578
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:39 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 8:43:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Basin - Legislation-Law - Compacts - Colorado River Compact
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
7/1/1986
Author
John U Carlson - Alan E Boles Jr
Title
Contrary Views of the Law of the Colorado River - An Examination of Rivalries Between the Upper and Lower Basins - John U Carlson and Alan E Boles Jr - 07-01-86
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0014.27 <br /> <br />law of the river, has developed to govern the River and <br /> <br />allocate its water among the Colorado Basin states and <br /> <br />between the United states and Mexico. <br /> <br />The cornerstone of <br /> <br />the law of .th~ river, the Colorado River Compact of 1922, <br />mat~lf"i'a..li~~e~l.;- principally as a result of fear of a recurrence <br />o,!::'JIObds that devastated parts of the lower River in 1905-07 <br /> <br />and again in 1916. <br /> <br />Ironically, though, the condition which <br /> <br />has most troubled the law of the River since its inception <br /> <br />has been the opposite problem: <br /> <br />insufficient quantities of <br /> <br />water. <br /> <br />Despite the apparent intentions of the framers of the <br /> <br />1922 Compact, the burden of these deficiencies is often <br /> <br />assumed to fall largely on the states of the Upper Basin. As <br /> <br />the director of Colorado's natural resources department <br /> <br />recently assessed this predicament, "The ultimate problem for <br /> <br />the Upper Basin is how to build a future on the right to <br /> <br />leftovers."7 <br /> <br />Perhaps, however, the more pertinent and <br /> <br />fundamental question is really whether the Upper Basin should <br />have to build its future on the right to leftovers, instead <br /> <br />of an equal portion of this co~on resource. The objective <br /> <br />of this paper is to explore briefly the salient features of <br /> <br />the law of the River and surVey the prospects for correcting <br /> <br />its most glaring inequities. <br /> <br />II. THE PRINCIPAL PARTS OF THE LAW OF THE RIVER <br /> <br />A. The Colorado River Compact of 1922 <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.