Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, . <br />. <br /> <br />0013B5 <br /> <br />the return flows would refill these cones of depression instead of <br />flowing out of the state on the surface or being inefficiently used. <br /> <br />ADDITIONAL RECHARGE <br /> <br />Present irrigation activities provide a considerable amount of recharge. <br />Planned pumping of this groundwater as has been described would make <br />it available for use at the most desirable times. Additional re- <br />charge during periods of relative water surplus could make more water <br />available from such pumps. 'It would have to be done in areas with <br />low water tables. <br /> <br />Another major loss which can potentially be salvaged in part is <br />reservoir evaporation. Losses from shallow reservoirs are great, <br />especially during the sUlllller. Long term storage in these reservoirs <br />should be avoided. This water could be stored in deeper upstream <br />reservoirs and in the groundwater aquifer. Then the shallow reservoirs <br />could be used for off-season storage when necessary and for temporary <br />storage of tributary flood water. <br /> <br />Perhaps the greatest potential use of additional recharge is near the <br />Colorado-Kansas state line. Both states are now using water with over <br />4,000 ppm salt for irrigation, but flood flows of higher quality go <br />through the system to the ocean. More than 25% of the groundwater <br />in the Colorado portion of the Arkansas aquifer is located within <br />eight miles of the state line. This is a constantly overflowing <br />reservoir unless the water table is lowered to permit recharge during <br />times of surplus. <br /> <br />Present compact provisions allow Colorado to draw up to 750 cfs and <br />Kansas up to 500 cfs at any time between April 1 and October 31, if <br />more than 20,000 acre-feet is in storage. Neither state gets credit <br />for water left in the reservoir if they don't divert at the same time <br />as the other state. This provision tends to discourage conservation. <br />Whenever the reservoir is empty Colorado irrigators divert the available <br />water under the priority system. Kansas just gets a little return flow. <br />Both states are very short of water during critical periods. <br /> <br />Kansas could be provided a smaller, continuous water supply during <br />the irrigation season by pumping from the aquifer. Lowering the water <br />table by this method would permit recharging the higher quality flood <br />waters. This would result in a much more dependable, higher quality <br />water supply for Kansas. Colorado could then have full control of <br />John Martin Reservoir, making it theoretically possible to hold the <br />water in storage and use it whenever it would do the most good.. <br /> <br />MANAGEMFNT <br /> <br />Recharge is only a part of the very complex water resources system <br />in the Arkansas Valley. No part of this system can be altered without <br />changes in the rest of the system. Recharge can be a useful tool if <br />used in conjunction with other tools. Careful study of the entire system <br />must precede any changes if mistakes are to be avoided. Such study <br />is also necessary because of the legal problems involved which need <br />to be worked out by mutual agreement. <br />