My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12574
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12574
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 8:50:06 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 8:43:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8059
Description
Section D General Statewide Issues - State Water Plan
State
CO
Date
9/6/1989
Author
David W Walker
Title
A Colorado State Water Plan-Do We Have One - David W Walker - CWCB - 09-06-89
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001353 <br /> <br />Thus, my response to the idea of a <br />state water plan is that perhaps one could <br />be written. but not implemented. But I <br />could also argue that it might not even be <br />possible to write such a plan at all. In <br />many respects, we allocate water according <br />to social values. There are a host of <br />different values and uses for water: <br />agriculture, instream-flow, municipal, <br />industrial. etc. . .. But if we change the <br />allocation of that supply, the changes will <br />be based upon social values. The point is <br />that I don't think we can agree in Colorado <br />on a comprehensive framework for the social <br />values of water. We can agree on a list of <br />uses, but we cannot agree on whether <br />agriculture should get more or less, or <br />whether instream-flow should get more or <br />less. The process of trying to reach <br />agreement on the comparative social value of <br />water uses, which would then lead to changes <br />in how we allocate water, is extremely <br />difficult and probably impossible. I <br />suggest that it's more divisive to try to do <br />that than to simply work within the existing <br />framework and make the existing systems work. <br /> <br />Another important perspective is provided by James S. <br /> <br />Lochhead. a member and former chairman of the Colorado Water <br /> <br />Conservation Board. and the state's representative to the Upper <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />Colorado River Commission. <br /> <br />He points out that: <br /> <br />It has become politically expedient to <br />state that "Colorado needs a state water <br />plan." Many of those who express this <br />position fail to state how they would <br />implement the plan. what it would do, and <br />why it would be better than the existing <br />system. <br /> <br />For example, traditional water <br />development interests have advocated a <br />statewide tax for the development of large <br />storage projects. Clearly, a plan would <br /> <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.