Laserfiche WebLink
<br />UPCO Final Report <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />000375 <br /> <br />May 29, 2003 <br />Page viii <br /> <br />flow levels and kayak low-flow levels. Reservoir levels during the summer recreation <br />season and flows in the Blue River below Dillon are influenced primarily by water <br />demands on the Denver System. <br /> <br />Green Mountain Reservoir and the Blue River Below Green Mountain: P ACSM <br />results indicated that flows in the Blue River below Green Mountain are usually above <br />the CWCB and fish minimum levels under all scenarios. However, kayaking flows were <br />below the minimum and optimum levels under current demands in all months except <br />June and July and under future demands in all months except July. <br /> <br />\f. Impacts of 2002-2003 Drought <br /> <br />As previously discussed, the 1947-1991 study period for the UPCO model includes a <br />number of wet, average and dry years. The study period includes the 1954-56 and 1977 <br />droughts, which have historically been used by water planners for estimating the "firm" <br />yield of their water supplies. The participants of the study realize that the current 2002- <br />2003 drought may present conditions even more severe than the past droughts. The <br />participants also recognize that a number of conditions have occurred to-date during the <br />2002-2003 drought that may present unique new challenges which need to be considered <br />in the future. These specific conditions include the following: <br /> <br />1:1 Streamflows in certain areas of the Colorado River Basin and its tributaries <br />were lower than in previous droughts. <br /> <br />1:1 Problems occurred with Green Mountain Reservoir including exhausting the <br />historic users pool (HUP) and the impact of the Heeney slide, which <br />prevented full use of the reservoir's available storage. <br /> <br />1:1 Denver Water reduced its by-pass flows past their Moffat Collection System, <br />significantly reducing streamflows in the Fraser River Basin. <br /> <br />1:1 Due to agreements between water users and Excel Energy, there were changes <br />in the administration of the Shoshone Call. <br /> <br />1:1 Clinton Reservoir may fail to fill for a fourth consecutive year, causing <br />shortages in the planned 3-year supply for certain shareholders. <br /> <br />1:1 Denver Water has nearly exhausted its Williams Fork Reservoir supply and <br />resorted to use of Dillon Reservoir to augment its Fraser River diversions. <br /> <br />The degree to which these problems affect the published yields and shortages in the <br />UPCO study are not certain. However, the participants agree that these issues should be <br />considered during the next phase (Phase III) of the study and evaluated for potential <br />impacts on the future shortages and water requirements of the water users in the basin. <br /> <br />VI. Next Steps <br /> <br />Phase II of the UPCO Study has identified a number of issues and problems that warrant <br />further study. The objectives for the next phase need to be identified and the role and <br />organization of UPCO needs to be defined. This may involve formation of one of more <br />