My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12566
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12566
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:39 PM
Creation date
7/31/2007 1:35:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8281.984
Description
Colorado River Studies and Investigations - Upper Colorado River Study Phase II
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
5/29/2003
Author
Hydrosphere Resource Consultants
Title
Phase II - Upper Colorado River Study - Executive Summary - Hydrosphere Resource Consultants - 05-29-03
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OJ0373 <br /> <br />UPCO Final Report <br />Executive Summary <br /> <br />May 29, 2003 <br />Page vi <br /> <br />As shown on the table, most water providers have sufficient water supplies to cover the <br />current levels of demand (see page viii ofthis Executive Summary for discussion of2002 <br />drought impacts). However, under future conditions, nearly two-thirds of the providers <br />are expected to have demands that exceed their current water rights and/or water <br />availability. The largest shortages are predicted for the Fraser River upstream of <br />Tabernash, the Blue River upstream of Dillon Reservoir, Snake River upstream of Dillon <br />Reservoir and Tenmile Creek upstream of Dillon Reservoir. <br /> <br />Even though the hydrologic model calculates volumes down to the acre-foot and flow <br />rates to a fraction of a cubic foot per second, the numbers provided on the table above, <br />and in the full report, should be considered as guidelines and not the exact value of the <br />shortage or supply. It is most useful to consider the reported values as relatively "large" <br />or "small" and use comparisons and common sense to get a feel for the size and <br />likelihood of future supplies and shortages. <br /> <br />IV. PACSM Analysis Results <br /> <br />Grand County <br /> <br />The analysis ofPACSM results was divided into sub-basins. <br /> <br />Fraser River Basin above and below the Town of Fraser: Under the PACSM model, <br />municipal and domestic water supplies were adequate for existing levels of water <br />demand, but most water providers would experience shortages under future demand <br />scenarios. Shortages would be most severe for the Grand County Water & Sanitation <br />District, ranging from an annual minimum of616 acre-feet to a maximum of 1,903 acre- <br />feet and averaging 996 acre-feet. These shortages would occur primarily in the fall and <br />winter months as a result of lack of physical supply and Denver's upstream diversions <br />and would coincide with periods when streamflow would be below the CWCB instream <br />flows, fish minimum flows and wastewater treatment plant low-flows. <br />Water quality impacts related to Berthoud Pass, though not specifically examined in this <br />study, emerged as issues. This includes water quality impacts related to winter sanding <br />operations on Berthoud Pass and the potential for an accident of a truck carrying <br />hazardous materials on Berthoud Pass. The latter could significantly affect water supply <br />in the upper part of the Fraser River, as most providers divert directly from the Fraser <br />with no alternative sources of supply. <br /> <br />Colorado River Basin above the Fraser River confluence: Municipal and domestic <br />water supplies were adequate under both existing and future demands. Though Northern <br />is required to bypass flows below Lake Granby to maintain minimum instream flow <br />requirements, instream flows below Lake Granby will be below CWCB, fish minimum <br />and fish optimum levels. However, due to data inadequacies, it is not clear exactly how <br />often this would occur. The only time flows will be below CWCB levels is when inflows <br />are less than the minimum flow. Lake levels in Lake Granby were not fully evaluated in <br />the study but should be before entering the solutions phase as lake levels relate to marina <br />operations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.