My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC12525
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSPC12525
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:35 PM
Creation date
7/30/2007 1:58:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8282.400
Description
Colorado River Operations and Accounting - Deliveries to Mexico
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
9/11/2001
Author
Unknown
Title
Colorado River Delta Symposium - United States-Mexico - Mexicali-Baja California - Symposium Report - Reviewed Copy with Staff Notes- 09-11-01
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />COLORADO <br />RIVER DELTA <br />BI-NATIONAL <br />SYMPOSIUM <br />PROCEEDINGS <br /> <br />ENGLISH <br />24 <br /> <br />consent. In most cases the authority to enter into <br />and implement IBWC minutes is found within <br />the 1944 treaty or other boundary treaties, which <br />charge the IBWC with their execution, or within <br />other existing U.s. statutory authorities. <br />Once authorized by the Department of State <br />to do so, the U.S. IBWC finalizes the terms and <br />conditions of the Minutes with its Mexican <br />counterpart. Following signature the Minutes <br />are forwarded to the Department of State and to <br />the Mexican Secretariat of Foreign Affairs. They <br />have traditionally entered into force as agree- <br />ments between the United States and Mexico <br />following the specific approval of both govern- <br />ments. <br /> <br />JAIME PALAFOX <br />PRIVATE CONSULTANT, WASHINGTON, <br />D.C.: <br /> <br />Mr. Palafox said he wanted to describe some <br />of the institutional alternatives that exist on an <br />international level that could aid in understand- <br />ing concerns about the Delta and whether those <br />concerns are warranted or need further study. <br />The technical side of the Delta must first be <br />understood before talking about the legal side. A <br />better understanding of the water flows and <br />existing conditions in the Delta, as well as the <br />overall health of the ecosystem, is needed. ~ <br />are now environmpnt::llc()nC'prns that didn't exist <br />when the 1944 Treaty was adopted and adopting <br />~ute 306 i~e avenlle of addressing this <br />c~e. <br />In 1983, existing treaties were considered <br />insufficient to deal with erupting environmental <br />problems. T~az Agre~nt hetween <br />Mexico and the U.S., is a border agreement that <br />allows the countries to address environmental <br />-- - <br />,~oble~of joint concern. It includes local, state <br />and federal institutions, including the IBWC and <br />includes issues such as hazardous waste, air <br />emissions and other issues. This is what existed <br />prior to the North American Free Trade Agree- <br />ment (NAFTA). <br />Within NAFTA what are known as the <br />parallel agreements were signed. Under NAFTA, <br /> <br />the Environmental Cooperation Commission <br />(ECC) was formed and designated NAFTA as <br />having an obligation to environmental issues for <br />the three countries (U.S., Mexico and Canada). <br />The commission is available to study j~ <br />probl~ms between the countries and develo <br />action progt:'ams to analyze and improve envi- <br />~ ----- <br />ronmental situations within the countries. The <br />;--.-- .--- <br />commission has a $10 million annual budget and <br />currently spends about $7 million annually. The <br />commission also has research capabilities that <br />allow it to verify that countries are complying <br />with their environmental regulations. <br />NAFTA promotes sustainable development <br />---- <br />including citizen involvement in environmental <br />issues. If local governments do not comply with <br />their own environmental regulations, citizens <br />can make them comply through complaints. It <br />also a ows citizens, bo ithin and outside of <br />the coun ortunit to present m- <br />.-~ <br />pl~~!.sme country is not meetingjts en~~~ <br />~ental obl!gatio~. This helps to maintain <br />objectivity and also applies to transboundary <br />environmental impacts. The ECC, by establish- <br />ing agreements on transboundary environmen- <br />tal impacts, has shown desire to make the <br />treatment of environmental issues more <br />transboundary permeable. Ecosystems do not <br />,~have borders. There should also be more compli- }~Ij <br />lJI-ance with regards to e~nging information. ~II <br />...------ <br />The North American Development Bank, <br />established under NAFTA, is designed to assist "')'~ <br />with the construction of environmental infra- :t <br />structure in the U.S. and Mexico. They have $10 <br />million annually to spend on feasible projects. <br />The bank is overseen by a board of directors that <br />establishes priorities for use of the financing. <br />These priorities are undergoing adjustments by <br />President Fox who wants to use the funding in <br />more efficient ways. Additional money will be <br />budgeted by the National Water Commission <br />and other Mexican institutions. The ECC works <br />with the bank, other institutions and the com- <br />munity to analyze the projects and determine <br />what is best. There fore, th~ ~.Cl.nk and.Jhe ECC <br />were created as two ~Earate institutions in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.