Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />COLORADO <br />RIVER DELTA <br />BI-NATIONAL <br />SYMPOSIUM <br />PROCEEDINGS <br /> <br />ENGLISH <br />14 <br /> <br />source, and we support the process that is in <br />place to identify the issues and to search for <br />appropriate means to address them. We also <br />believe that the goal of this conference, which is <br />to establish a shared factual understanding of <br />current conditions, is the appropriate starting <br />point for any effort to address these issues. In <br />fact, this conference grew, in part, out of a <br />specific request for a greater understanding of <br />the Delta region that emerged from discussions <br />between the United States stakeholders and the <br />federal government last year. <br />As we proceed with this conference and with <br />Delta discussions, we believe that this effort <br />. should be guided by five fundamental prin- <br />ciples. First. the Delta calls for a bi-national <br />approach which fully respects the sovereignty ~f <br />both nations. Second, sound sciencp ''!nO rlA_ - <br />.. .~ <br />tailed knowledge must be the foundation of <br />every proposal for actiop. Third, the solution <br />'~st fit within the existing framewQXk. Fourth, <br />the process should serve as a forum for the free <br />exchange of information. And fifth, and perhaps <br />most importantly, !! is critical that w~k <br />s9lutions that are positive for stakeholder~ on <br />both sides of the border. <br />- - <br />I want to emphasize this last point. The <br />Colorado River, from its headwaters in the State <br />of Colorado to its final destination in the Gulf of <br />California, is a vital water lifeline for the most <br />arid region of North America. <br />Within the United States, it's been called the <br />River of Controversy, and the limited waters of <br />the Colorado have indeed been the source of <br />numerous, and at times bitter, domestic conflicts. <br />Our Upper Basin states have struggled to protect <br />their right to future development in light of the <br />faster growing population centers in lower basin <br />cities. <br />Arizona has repeatedly sought judicial help t <br />protect its claims on the river. California has <br />had to confront the limits of its entitlement even <br />as its needs have grown dramatically, and the <br />same is true for Nevada who has to deal with <br />the explosive growth of the Las Vegas area. <br /> <br />Further, we know that our history, our <br />common history, is that the United States and <br />Mexico achieved a treaty in 1944 after decades of <br />debate. We remain committed to honor and <br />protect the compromise between our two <br />nations which is embodied in the treaty and <br />which has allowed the waters of the Colorado to <br />be harnessed and fully utilized on both sides of <br />the international border. <br />I mention this sensitive history to contrast it <br />with the progress our basin states, the seven <br />states within the United States of the Colorado <br />River Basin, have made recently in fashioning <br />consensual approaches to a number of difficult <br />and long-standing problems. <br />Nevada and Arizona have negotiated an <br />innovative method for storing water that can <br />stretch the river's supply to meet Nevada's <br />impending needs. In California, new proposals <br />for conservation in agricultural use are facilitat- <br />ing transfers to meet metropolitan demand <br />through voluntary agreements. Similarly, all <br />basin states have come together to support a <br />plan that will permit California to bring its <br />Colorado River uses within its entitlement. All <br />these efforts show the value of consensus-based <br />., <br />negotiation. They also demonstrate how tightly <br />allocated the Colorado River is within the <br />available supply. <br />In moving forward with the next important <br />agenda items for the Colorado, and particularly <br />those involving the Colorado River Delta, we <br />cannot jeopardize these innovative foundations <br />that are essential to the future administration of <br />the river. <br />In addition, the United States faces its own se <br />of difficult issues with respect to the drainage <br />bypass flows to the Cienega de Santa Clara <br />which have been recognized as an important <br />wetland habitat within the Delta region, The <br />United States government, however, has a <br />national obligation to replace the bypass flows <br />for water users in the United States. We are <br />hopeful that innovative solutions can be found <br />which respect the interests of the water users in <br /> <br /> <br />