My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12542
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12542
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:33 PM
Creation date
7/30/2007 12:00:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8282.400
Description
Colorado River Operations and Accounting - Deliveries to Mexico
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
5/1/2001
Author
David and Lucille Packard Foundation
Title
Immediate Options for Augmenting Water Flows to the Colorado River Delta in Mexico - RE-Colorado River-Mexican Delta Issues - 05-01-01
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />002017 <br /> <br />governmental entities to provide an interim water supply for the Delta while needed research <br />continues. <br /> <br />'Ibis report proposes two sources of water that could be secured in the short-run for <br />furnishing a sustainable, annual supply of water to some of the ecosystems in the Delta. One source <br />involves the purchase of marginal agricultural land with water rights in Mexico, and the dedication <br />of those water rights for establishing specific areas of cottonwood and willow habitat in the river <br />corridor below Morelos Dam. Appropriate parcels have been identified for this purpose, and the <br />acquired water could amount to as much as 15,000 AFY. Legal research conducted for this report <br />confirms that water rights in the Mexicali and San Luis Rio Colorado Valleys can be purchased and <br />transferred for ecological purposes with the concurrence of local and federal Mexican officials. <br /> <br />The second proposed source of water is agricultural runoff from farmland near Yuma, <br />Arizona. This runoff is unrelated to the 125,000 AFY of brackish water already by-passed from <br />Wellton-Mohawk to Mexico. Currendy, the Yuma agricultural drainage water is returned to the <br />Colorado River at the Northerly International Boundary and to the Southerly International <br />Boundary where it is counted as part of Mexico's 1.5 million AFY annual treaty entidement. As <br />much as 75,000 acre-feet of Yuma irrigation runoff is available for diversion. This report proposes <br />that facilities be constructed to divert an appropriate amount of Yuma brackish flows directly into <br />targeted ecological areas in Mexico and, in particular, the agricultural land purchased and retired as <br />part of this proposal. The Yuma brackish water would not be counted against Mexico's 1.5 million <br />AFY entidement, and thus Mexico would receive deliveries of an equivalent amount of higher <br />quality substitute Minute 242 Well Field groundwater or mainstream Colorado River water released <br />from Lake Mead. ' <br /> <br />The options proposed in this report are bilateral measures that can be implemented without <br />significant delay if the responsible parties are' amenable to solving the problem. Based on the <br />research and interviews conducted for this report, these options are likely to encounter the fewest <br />practical, political, and financial challenges and arouse less controversy than many other options. <br />Nevertheless, implementation of the options will require. coordinated action and funding from <br />public and private sources and should have the concurrence of the two nations. through a Minute to <br />the 1944 Treaty. A comprehensive, long-term solution, on the other hand, will require considerable <br />research as well as negotiations among multiple stakeholders. <br /> <br />The actions proposed in this report could constitute important first steps in addressing the <br />ecological needs of the Delta. Moreover, implementation of the proposals could help to sustain and <br />to restore important habitat in the short-term while the scient$c and diplomatic processes seek a <br />comprehensive, long-term Delta management strategy. The actions proposed in this report are, <br />therefore, intended to complement and build upon the ongoing work of government agencies, non~ <br />government organizations and universities to better understand the Delta ecosystems and promote <br />their restoration.2 Implementing these proposals in the short-term will result in benefits to. both <br />countries and, most importandy, the ecology of the Delta. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.