Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />002038 <br /> <br />. Periodic releases of larger volumes of water to the Delta for flushing purposes would <br />increase the risk of shortages in the United States unless the reservoirs were <br />subsequendy refilled with high runoff; and, <br /> <br />. Delivery of operational over-deliveries ~f Colorado River water to Mexico in excess <br />of the Treaty delivery requirements to the Delta wetlands is limited by needs of <br />agricultural water users in Mexico and canal capacity. Also, as a part of the program <br />to line the All American Canal, plans are being developed to build additional <br />regulating reservoirs, that could reduce the magnitude and frequency of such <br />operational over-deliveries of water to Mexico and to the Delta. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />While recognizing that all potential sources of Delta water supplies are problematic, the <br />report does not dismiss or .endorse any of them as a water supply for long-term Delta management. <br />Ultimately, the solution to the ecological problems of the Delta will require considerable technical <br />inquiry that could take years. Agreement on the goals and the design of a truly comprehensive <br />approach for protection of the Delta's ecosystems will require the collaboration al!d best efforts of <br />all interested parties. TIlls report merely attempts to identify and test alternatives that appear to have <br />the least political, legal, and financial complications and that could be implemented in a relatively <br />short time. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Two combinations of supplies were selected that the authors of this report believe could <br />provide a sustainable near-term supply of water for protection and enhancement of Delta ecological <br />resources. These options are not entirely free of physical, economic, institutional, social, and <br />environmental problems; however, they appear to offer a feasible means of providffig important <br />near-term ecological benefits. The two options are: <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />A. Fresh Water Sources <br /> <br />TIlls alternative involves the purchase and retirement from willing Mexican landowners of <br />about 2,000 hectares (5,000 acres) of marginal, privately-owned agricultural land west of Mexicali or <br />south of the Compaction Zone. 1bis would provide approximately 15,000 acre-feet of water per <br />year that could be designated to restoring Delta habitat. The 2,OOO-hectare objective was developed <br />with the assistance of local CNA staff and represents an estimate of the marginal agricultural land <br />. that could be retired from an operational perspective with minimal impact on established agricultural <br />uses. As a comprehensive Delta management program is developed, the opportunity to expand <br />such purchases can be explored. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The United States now provides operational over-deliveries of Colorado River water, when <br />available. These waters are expected to average about 30,000 acre-feet per year. When they occur, <br />the flow volumes often exceed the water delivery needs of water users in District 014 under current <br />operation strategies. Operational over-deliveries that exceed demands flow into the river corridor <br />below Morelos Dam. <br /> <br />Together, these two sources would provide an average of 45,000 acre-feet per year of fresh <br />water to the Delta. CNA would be requested to use its infrastructure to deliver the 15,000 acre-feet <br />per year of purchased water rights and to divert and wheel unused operational over-deliveries to <br />identified tracts of land within the river corridor betWeen Morelos Dam and the confluence with the <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />23 <br />