Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002024 <br /> <br />III. MANAGEMENT OF THE COLORADO RIVER IN THE UNITED STATES <br />AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO MEXICO <br /> <br />A. The Law of the River <br /> <br />Distribution of Colorado River water within the United States is accomplished through a <br />complex system of physical facilities. lbis system is operated to comply with legal obligations under <br />statutes, interstate compacts, court decrees, regulations and contracts, known collectively as "the law <br />of the river." <br /> <br />In 1922, the Colorado River Compact divided water between the Upper basin states <br />(Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and New Mexico) and ,lower basin states (California, Arizona and <br />Nevada). The upper basin states agreed to deliver, on the average, 7.5 million acre-feet of water per <br />year to the lower basin states. Later, the Colorado River Basin Project Act empowered the Secretary <br />of Interior to operate facilities to deliver more or less than 7.5 million acre-feet to the lower basin <br />states in years when he detennines that there will be a surplus or shortage of water in the river. A <br />1944 treaty with Mexico promised that the United States would deliver 1.5 million acre-feet of water <br />each year to Mexico, except in surplus or shortage years9. Under the compact, the responSIbility for <br />delivering that water, if there is a shortage, comes equally out of the Upper and Lower Basin <br />apportionments of water. <br /> <br />In 1928, the Boulder Canyon Project Act divided the lower basin's first 7.5 million acre-feet <br />per year of mainstream water among Califomia (4.4 million acre-feet per year), Arizona (2.8 million <br />acre-fe~t per year), and Nevada (300,000 acre-feet per year). In its 1963 Opinion in Ariwna v. <br />California, the United States 'Supreme Court upheld the division of the 1928 Act. The Court's decree <br />also provided that Califomia.would receive 50% of any surplus water, Arizona, 46%, and Nevada, <br />4%. The upper basin's share - up to 7.5 million acre-feet after Mexico and the lower basin get their <br />guaranteed deliveries - was divided in a compact allocating Colorado 51.75%, Utah 23%, Wyoming <br />14%, New Mexico 11.25%, and Arizona 50,000 acre-feet per year. <br /> <br />As one of the most "controlled" rivers in the world, the Colorado today is radically different <br />than it was a century ago. At the beginning of the last century, a national vision evolved that <br />embodied "taming" the river to meet human needs for flood control, water, power and the irrigation <br />of desert fannland. That vision resulted in the construction of the great Hoover and Glen Canyon <br />Dams and other facilities to divert the river's waters and generate electricity for cities and farms. <br />Today, the river maintains a society and an economy that far surpasses the vision of those who <br />began managing the river a century ago. <br /> <br />Most river management infrastructure was financed, built, and is operated by the US Bureau <br />of Reclamation, an agency of the US Department of the Interior. The cost of much of this <br />infrastructure has been or is being reimbursed by t4e sale of water and power to the many project <br />beneficiaries. Some water projects have been planned and constructed by the private sector and by <br />local governments. Examples include the irrigation works that serve: the Imperial and Palo Verde <br />Valleys as well as the locally financed facilities of the Metropolitan Water District that convey <br />Colorado River water to Southern California. <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />