My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12538
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12538
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:33 PM
Creation date
7/30/2007 11:59:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8282.400
Description
Colorado River Operations and Accounting - Deliveries to Mexico
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
8/1/2001
Author
Jennifer Pitt - Chris W Fitzer - Lisa Force
Title
Replacing the Bypass Flow on the Colorado River - Economic and Environmental Considerations - RE-Colorado River-Mexican Delta Issues - 08-01-01
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001983 <br /> <br />. Pitt er al, August 2001. Replacing the Bypass Flow On The Colorado River <br /> <br />Commission in 1972, and the subsequent passage of the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control <br />Act of 19745 (CRBSCA) were intended to address Mexico's concerns over rising salinity levels <br />in the Colorado. <br /> <br />Mexico's complaints about salinity in the Colorado River started when extraordinarily high <br />volumes of salt were introduced to the river by agriculture in theWel1ton~Mohawk hrigation and <br />Drainage District. The Wellton..Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District (WMIDD) is located <br />in Yuma County, Arizona along the Gila River valley. A division of the Gila. Project, Wellton- <br />Mohawk is located 12 miles east of the city of Yuma and extends 45 miles into the Gila River <br />valley. GroU?dwater irrigation of the area began in 1906 and by 1934 many Wellton-:Mohawk <br />wells were exhibiting excessive levels of salt and the water table had declined dramatically. <br />Many farms were abandoned until 1952 when the Bureau of Reclamation' brought Colorado <br />River water to the area with the Gila project.6 Unfortunately, poor drainage throughout WMIDD <br />resulted in the mixing of irrigation wastewater with highly saline aquifer water. The brackish <br />groundwater eventually rose to the surface of the agricultural fields, killing thousands of acres of <br />crops and flooding basements. In order to mitigate these problems, the" BOR installed an <br />elaborate tile drain system in the early 1960's, at a cost of$14 million.? . <br /> <br />The saline drainwater (6300 ppm as compared to 700 ppm before WMIDD irrigated with <br />Colorado River water) was pumped into the Gila River near its confluence with the Colorado <br />River. Delivery of the drainwater to the Colo.rado River resulted in overall increased salinity in <br />the River and extensive damage-to agricultural fields.downstream in the Mexicali Valley, In <br />1965, the US and Mexico adopted Minute 218 of the International Boundary and Water <br />CommissIon (IBWC) to reroute the saline Wellton-Mohawk drain water away from the Colorado <br />River mainstern, and into Mexico's Gulf of California via a newly constructed canal. 8 However, <br />an extension to this new canal, known as the Main Outlet Drain Extension (MODE),9 was built <br />with its tenirinus in a below sea-level depression in what formerly was the delta of the Colorado <br />River. Now that Wellton-Mohawk drainwater~ known as the bypass flow, has flowed there for <br />several d~cades it has revived some of the delta's former ecosystem, and presently sustains the <br />Cienega de Santa Clara. At present the MODE delivers an annual average of 110,000 acre-feet <br />of water to the Cienega de Santa Clara.lO . <br /> <br />The Clenega de Santa Clara <br />The introduction of Wellton-Mohawk's saline drainwater into the Cienega, de Santa Clara <br />reclaimed some of the Colorado River's delta. . Before development upstream diminished the <br />Colorado River's flows in its southernmost reaches, the Colorado River delta was a vast, <br /> <br />s <br />43 U.S.C. ~ 1571 ~ . . <br />6 U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Gila Project webpage: < httD://dataweb.usbr.l!ov/html/lrila.html>. Colorado River <br />water was first delivered to Wellton-Mohawk fields in 1952 with completion of the Gila Project in 1957. <br />7 U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, (1977). Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project, Title I Division, Desalting <br />Complex Unit, Arizona; Status Report, p. 146. . <br />8 Full Text of Minute 218 can be found in U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, (1985). Colorado River Basin Salinity <br />Control Act Handbook, A-11-A-13. <br />9 The MODE is in fact a sequence of canals known (from upstream down) as the Main Outlet Drain, th~ Main <br />Outlet Drain Extension, andthe Bypass Extenstion. <br />10 International Boundary and Water Commission (1991-1998). Western Water Bulletin: Flow ofthe Colorado and <br />other Western Bounda.Ir StreamS and Related Data. Department of State, USA. [published annually]. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.