Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~\\Il,..."n <br />tnJ1Ul.\J <br /> <br />2002] <br /> <br />THE lAST GREEN lAGOON <br /> <br />975 <br /> <br />I. ~ <br /> <br />the Mexican diversions, the cost savings would still be <br />significant.424 Decreased salinity would reduce damage to city <br />water delivery systems and consumers; for example, both <br />Mexicali and Tijuana receive much of their municipal supply <br />from the Colorado River.425 This dependence is expected to <br />increase due to the exploding population and the gradual <br />drawdown of groundwater supplies.426 <br />Savings to Mexican agriculture would likewise be enormous. <br />The Imperial Valley in the U.S. and Mexicali Valley in Mexico are <br />roughly proportionate in size and character (Mexicali Valley is <br />actually the southem half of the Imperial Valley basin).427 The <br />BOR study estimated that 1 ppm of additional salt at Imperial <br />Dam would collectively cost Imperial Valley farmers at least <br />$108,000 in direct and perhaps an. additional $240,000 in <br />indirect costs,428 lID serves approximately 490,000 acres.429 <br />whereas Mexicali Valley has 530,000 acres under irrigation.430 <br />Given the overall similarity and geographic proximity of the <br />Imperial and Mexicali Valleys, the costs and potential savings <br />associated with Colorado River salinity.. would presumably be <br />comparable. <br />The United States government would also see signific_ant <br />savings. The Yuma desalinization plant will cost an estimated <br />$25 million annually to operate, in addition to periodic $18 <br />million replacements of desalting equipment.431 Even in its <br />current ready-'reserve status, the plant still costs nearly $6.8 <br /> <br />i <br />~ <br /> <br />I <br />L <br />r <br />,- <br />I <br /> <br />424. For example, the FINAL EIS for the new surplus criteria predicted a 19 ppm <br />average decrease in salinity (around 2.2%) at Imperial Dam resulting from only an <br />occasional transfer (under extremely dry conditions)' of 100.000 af of water from PVID <br />to MWD. FINAL EIS, supra note 71. at 3.5-9. These benefits accounted only for the <br />reduction in salt loading due to the temporary discontinuance of irrigation in PVID - <br />there is no dilution benefit, but rather a dilution deficit. since the water is removed <br />from the river upstream of Imperial Dam. See id. If these benefits can be achieved <br />without dilution. the salinity reduction effects of even a smaller amount of water <br />transferred annually for Delta use ought to be comparable (due to the added benefits <br />of dilution); the benefits of a larger. flood-size transfer (260,000 af or more) could be <br />expected to be even larger. <br />425. See Hayes, supra note 53, at 808. <br />426. Id. <br />427. Id at 803, 808; FRADKIN, supra note 9. at 268. See also MORRISON ET AL., <br />supra note 137, at 11, 31. <br />428. WORSTER, supra note 174, at 323. <br />429. FRADKIN, supra note 9, at 268. <br />430. Hayes, supra note 53, at 808. Some of the acreage in both Imperial and <br />Mexicali valleys is served by groundwater~ MORRISON ET AL.. supra note 137. at 11, <br />31. <br />431. PONTIUS, supra note 3, at 68. <br />