Laserfiche WebLink
<br />001531 <br /> <br />916 <br /> <br />ECOLOGY lA W QUARTERLY <br /> <br />[Vol. 28:903 <br /> <br />Water Treaty grants broad jurisdiction to IBWC to "plan, build, <br />and manage water works; to enter into further agreements <br />regarding international waters, "59 and to "settle all differences <br />that may arise between the two governments with respect to the <br />interpretation or application of this Treaty, subject to the <br />approval of the two governments. "60 IBWC also inherited the <br />powers of the older International Boundary Commission, created <br />in 1889 to manage border disputes.51 Thus, IBWC jurisdiction <br />extends through the entire border region, taking in both dry <br />lands and rivers, and includes not only water disputes but also <br />"virtually any border-related issue."62 <br />The Compact and the Mexico-U.S. Water Treaty's division of <br />Colorado River water is responsible for the central problem of the <br />Law of the River: it apportions more water than actually exists. 63 <br />The Compact and the Treaty allocate at least 17.5 maf.64 When <br />the Compact was signed in 1922, however, the annual flow of the <br />river past Lee's Ferry was estimated at 16.8 maf, based on flows <br />from 1896 to 1921;65 another study based on 1906 to 1921 flows <br />computed the average at 18.1 maf.56 In actuality, flows over the <br />past 400 years (based on analysis of tree rings) averaged only <br />13.5 maf.67 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />, <br />,. <br />c <br /> <br />L <br />i: <br />1 <br />! <br />, <br /> <br />59. See id at III (citations omitted). <br />60. See Mexico-U.S. Water Treaty, supra note 53, Art. 24(d). IBWC's jurisdiction <br />under the Mexico-U.S. Water Treaty consists of three distinct categories: its <br />"adjudicatory functions. " its "administrative functions, . and its "investigative <br />functions." Hesse, supra note 54, at 154. "Through its adjudicative powers. the IBWC <br />can call and question witnesses and bring actions in the courts of the United States <br />and Mexico. Through its administrative powers, the IBWC can undertake <br />construction projects needed to carry out agreements. Through. its investigative <br />duties, the IBWC can engage in' activities such as collecting information, measuring <br />surface water' consumption and loss. and assessing the reserves of surface water <br />available to each country.' ld <br />61. See Sinclair, supra note 33, at 111. <br />62. Hesse, supra note 54. at 153" 154~ <br />63. This is not an unusual characteristic of Western water law. The prior <br />appropriation system that dominates in the West pe'rmits legal rights to more water <br />than there is water in a stream in any given year. See JOSEPH L. SAX ET AL., LEGAL <br />CONTROL OF WATER REsOURCES 105-108 (3id ed~ 2000). <br />64. See generuUy Mexico-U.S. Water Treaty, supra note 53; Colorado River <br />Compact, supra note 47. <br />65. See FRADKIN, supra note 9, at 188. The Reclamation Service later became the <br />Bureau of Reclamation. <br />66. See Garner. supra note 46, at472. <br />67. See CHARLES W. STOCKTON & GORDON C. JACOBY, JR., LoNG-TERM SURFACE- <br />WATER SUPPLY AND STREAMFLOW TRENDS IN THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER BASIN 38 (1976) <br />(Lake Powell Research Project Bulletin No. 18). <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />\ <br />