My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12529
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12529
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:29 PM
Creation date
7/30/2007 9:35:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8282.400
Description
Colorado River Operations and Accounting - Deliveries to Mexico
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/1/2001
Author
Michael Cohen
Title
Colorado River Delta Efforts Make Progress - Excerpted from Pacific Institute Report - Newsletter of the Pacific Institute for studies in Development-Environment-Security - Winter 2001-2002 - 12-01-01
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />GOQ5tj7 <br /> <br />UPDATE WATER <br /> <br />"New Economy of Water" Report Plumbs <br />Water Privatization, Globalization <br /> <br />The headlong rush <br />toward private <br />markets. has failed to <br />address some of the <br />most important <br />issues and concerns <br />about water. <br /> <br />By Dr. Peter H. Gleick, President <br /> <br />Old approaches to addressing water problems - build- <br />ing large-scale dams, pipelines, and irrigation systems - <br />have brought great benefits to hundreds of millions of <br />people, but they have also had great costs. <br />One of the costs: Billions of people still struggle with- <br />out access to the most basic water services - safe drink- <br />ing water and adequate sanitation services. <br />New voices have begun to be heard in the water de- <br />bate, and new ideas - good and bad - considered. <br />Among the most powerful and controversial of these <br />new ideas is that water should be considered an "eco- <br />nomic good," subject to the rules and <br />power of markets, prices, multina- <br />tional corporations, and international <br />trading regimes. In the last decade, <br />this idea has been put into practice in <br />dozens of ways, in hundreds of places, <br />affecting millions of people. <br />Prices have been set for water pre- <br />viously provided for free. Private com- <br />panies have been invited to take over <br />the management, operation, and <br />sometimes even the ownership of previously public wa- <br />ter systems. Commercial trade in bottled water has <br />boomed. International development agencies that used <br />to work with governments to improve water services are <br />now pushing privatization efforts. Proposals have been <br />floated to transfer large quantities of fresh water across <br />international borders and even across oceans. <br />These ideas and trends have generated enormous con- <br />troversy; but far more heat than light. Many unanswered <br />questions remain about the true implications and conse- <br />quences of treating water as an economic good and <br />whether these new approaches can effectively and equi- <br />tably serve human and environmental needs. <br />C?ntroversy is building about protecting ecosystem <br />qualIty and access to water. Debate is growing about <br />how - and even whether - to price and sell a resource as <br />fundamental and vital as water. Concern has been raised <br />about how fresh water should be defined and treated by <br />sweeping new international trade agreements. Violent <br /> <br />protests have broken out over efforts to give private mul- <br />tinational corporations control over local water resources. <br />In order to address these issues, the Pacific Institute <br />is releasing a comprehensive analysis of this "new <br />economy" of water ("The New Economy of Water" by <br />Peter H. Gleick, Gary Wolff, Elizabeth Chalecki, Rachel <br />Reyes). It discusses the globalization, privatization, and <br />commodification of water; defmes terms; reviews cases <br />and examples; and offers principles and standards to guide <br />policy-makers in the future. <br />There is little doubt that the headlong rush toward pri- <br />vate markets has failed to address some of the most im- <br />portant issues and concerns about <br />water, In particular, water has vital <br />social, cultural, and ecological roles <br />to play that cannot be protected by <br />purely market forces. In addition <br />, <br />certain management goals and so- <br />cial values require direct and strong <br />government support and protection. <br />Some of the consequences of <br />privatization may be irreversible, <br />hence they deserve special scrutiny <br />and control. <br />As a result, the report concludes that any efforts to <br />privatize or commodify water must be evaluated far more <br />carefully than they have been and accompanied by guar- <br />antees to respect certain principles and support specific <br />social objectives. <br />Among these are the need to provide for basic human <br />and ecosystem water requirements, permit equitable ac- <br />cess to water for poor populations, include affected par- <br />ties in decision making, and increase reliance on water- <br />use efficiency and productivity improvements. <br />Op~nness, transparency, and strong public regulatory <br />oversIght are fundamental requirements in any efforts to <br />shift the public responsibility for providing clean water to <br />private entities. These principles are defmed and sum- <br />marized in this paper. <br /> <br />The paper will be available for free from our website. <br />Hard copies of the report can be ordered for $20 from <br />the Institute. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.