Laserfiche WebLink
<br />LANDT"ETTER: The Natural Resources Weekly Report <br />of ., e , <br /> <br />Page 1 of2 <br /> <br />oOn5J7 <br /> <br /> <br />Thursday, May 05, 2005 <br /> <br />2. COLORADO RIVER <br />Enviros, water officials offer plan for reopening Yuma Desalting Plant <br />April Reese, Land Letter Southwest reporter <br /> <br />After nine months of negotiations, environmentalists and water managers have come up with a plan to restart a <br />controversial desalting plant in Arizona without harming a nearby wetland that has become a haven for myriad <br />species, including an endangered bird. <br /> <br />For years, environmentalists and water managers in the southern Colorado River Basin have tussled over the <br />reopening of the Yuma Desalting Plant in southwestern Arizona. The $211 million facility has been shuttered <br />since flooding on the Gila River damaged the facility and forced the Bureau of Reclamation, which runs the plant, <br />to shut it down in 1993 (La.!!4J..etter.., August 21,2003). <br /> <br />The closure of the plant resulted in an incidental ecological benefit: Highly saline agricultural water that would <br />have been diverted for treatment to the plant has been rerouted into the Colorado River Delta, bypassing the <br />Lower Colorado River and expanding the Cienega de Santa Clara wetland to 40,000 acres. The wetland has <br />become an important stop for migratory birds and provides crucial habitat for 95 species, including the <br />endangered Yuma clapper rail. <br /> <br />The recent drought in the Southwest -- five years and .counting -- <br />as well as increased demand has led to a call among many water <br />users to bring the plant back online. Treating salty irrigation <br />water and returning it to the Colorado River would allow the <br />United States to meet its treaty obligations to Mexico while <br />keeping more water in U.S. reservoirs upstream. <br /> <br /> <br />"You could argue they're releasing 100,000 acre-feet of water out <br />of Lake Mead each year that they don't have to to meet treaty <br />obligations," said Robert Barrett, a spokesman for the Central <br />Arizona Project, which distributes Colorado River water to cities <br />and farmers. "So that's 100,000 acre-feet a year that we could <br />still have in storage if the plant was still in operation." <br /> <br />The Yuma Desalting Plant is located on a 60-acre tract of land <br />about 5 miles west of Yuma, Ariz. Photo courtesy of the <br />Bureau of Reclamation. <br /> <br />But environmental groups have fought the reopening of the plant, which they fear would dry up the 40,OOO-acre <br />wetland that is sustained by the salty water the plant was built to treat. Instead of the irrigation runoff it receives <br />now, the wetland would receive only a stream of brine waste from the desalting plant. <br /> <br />"Our concern is that if that happened, the Cienega would be lost," said Patrick Graham of the Nature <br />Conservancy. "We felt it was critical to preserve that precious habitat." <br /> <br />But earlier this week, environmentalists and water managers unveiled a plan for restarting the plant -- the second- <br />largest reverse osmosis desaltirig plant in the world -- while keeping the wetland wet. <br /> <br />The recommendations, drafted by a working group consisting of four environmental groups and officials from the <br />Central Arizona Project, Arizona Department of Water Resources, city of Yuma and Bureau of Reclamation, <br />include paying farmers to fallow their fields and pumping waterlogged areas near Yuma, which are too soggy to <br />farm or develop, to provide an alternate source of water for the wetland. The plan also calls for improving water <br /> <br />http://www.eenews.net/Landletter/inc1ude/print. php ?single=0505 05 02 <br /> <br />5/5/2005 <br />