Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OOd2D7 <br />Southwest Colorado's Snowpack Improves but, it's <br />Still Below Average <br /> <br /> <br />A powerful, mid-March storm added to the southwest Colorado's snowpack and improved the water situation, <br />but the region is still playing catch-up. <br /> <br />According to information from the March 1 "Colorado Basin Outlook Report," published by the USDA's <br />Natural Resources Conservation Service, the San Miguel, Dolores, Animas and San Juan River basins "finally <br />received some much-needed, above-average snowfalls during February." "Overall, the snowpack accumulation <br />went up 22% of average from last month Oanuary) and is now 63% of average. All of the watersheds managed <br />to receive additional snow accumulation during February, but the Animas and the Dolores watersheds were by <br />far the biggest winners with some of the largest increases in snowpack percent of average in the state." <br /> <br />Even with that moisture, the lower elevations and valleys received only 84% of average precipitation during <br />February, according to the report, and the water year total (as of March 1) was only 43% of average. <br />Good news comes in the form of southwest Colorado's reservoir storage, which is 116% of average for this time <br />of year and 16% more storage than last year at this time. The forecasted streamflows for this runoff season <br />remain below average, and the improved snowpack conditions have allowed many of the forecasts to improve as <br />well. The streamflows are highly variable and range from 50% on the Rio Blanco at Blanco Diversion, to 82% of <br />average on the San Miguel River near Placerville. Caution is still the watchword. "Even with the additional <br />snowfall, most of the state can continue to expect a below average runoff season in 2000." <br /> <br />The statewide snowpack is 80% of average as of March with the northern half of the state at near-or above- <br />normal snowpacks and decreasing amounts the farther south one travels from 1-70. <br /> <br />Precipitation in the lower elevations, though improving, still lags. "Water year totals for the first five months <br />of the water year remain below average in all basins and are only 69% of average for the state." <br /> <br />Reservoir storage is "one of the brightest highlights of the 2000 water year," according to the report, with <br />storage statewide at 142% of average. "This volume amounts to slightly more than 1.3 million acre-feet above <br />the average mark for March 1, and is 10% more than last year's storage." For streamflows statewide, the repon <br />notes an improved prospect for runoff, but foresees "below average volumes for most of the state's rivers." , <br /> <br />r Surface Water Supply <br />I Index for Colorado <br /> <br /> <br />LEGEND <br />Major River <br />""'--/"" <br />Basin Boundary <br />."..-. <br />SWSI Value <br />[KE] <br /> <br />SCALE <br />+4 Abundant Supply <br />+2 Near Normal <br />.2 Moderate Drought <br />-3 Severe Drought <br />-4 Extreme Drought <br /> <br />March 1 J 2000 <br /> <br />The Surface Water Supply Index (SWSI) is a <br />weighted value derived for each major basin which <br />generally expresses the potential availability of the <br />forthcoming season's water supply. The components <br />used in computing the index are reservoir storage, <br />snowpack water equivalent and precipitation. The <br />SWSI number for each basin ranges from a -4.0 <br />(prospective water supplies extremely poor) to a +4.0 <br />(prospective water supplies plentiful). The SWSI <br />number is only a general indicator of surface water <br />supply condition. Further data analysis may be <br />required in specific situations to more fully <br />understand the impacts of abnormally dry or wet <br />conditions suggested by the SWSI. Development <br />of the SWSI has been a cooperative effort between <br />the Colorado State Engineer's Office and the Natural <br />Resources Conservation Service. , <br /> <br />3 <br />