Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />56 <br /> <br />F, ZAMORA-ARROYO ET AL <br /> <br />REGENERATION OF TREES IN RESPONSE TO FLOOD RELEASES <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Soil samples and ground-water monitoring <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Morel.. Dam <br />FIoros ValeDa..l. <br />Cinco de Mayo <br />Okcnon <br />SuLuis <br />D =i~~ <br />,. ~onh Rail Road Bridg. <br />I Cann~ Jesus Gonzales Qrtep <br />Ena CouonwoodlWillows <br />o SIlO 1000 ISOO <br />M..... <br /> <br />Three soil samples from the top 20 cm of soil profile in each zone (n = 42) were <br />analysed for % sand, silt and clay and electrical conductivity (BC) of a 1: 1 extract by <br />Laboratory Consultants, Inc., Tempe, Arizona. Soil texture class was determined by the <br />proportion of sand, silt and clay in each sample. Well points (5 cm diameter steel tubes <br />with a perforated sand point at the tip) were installed into the water table at or near four <br />of the transects (2-3 per transect spaced ca. 100 m apart perpendicular to the river, 10 <br />total, plus two additional points at Campo Munoz, in the tidally influenced portion of <br />river) to monitor ground-water. Water depth was determined after pumping three or <br />more volumes of water from the casing with a hand pump then allowing the well to <br />recharge; a sample was measured for electrical conductivity (BC) by the U.S. Geological <br />Survey lab, Tucson, Arizona. Well points were sampled in November 1999 and January <br />and February 2000. <br /> <br />& <br />jso <br />~ <br /> <br />100 <br />SIlO <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />Flores Valenzuela Soil a 28'6% <br />25'0% <br />j5 3422 <br />:i <br /> <br /> <br />SAND. &53 (0-58) cIS M-I 62 m <br />0'10 <br />44 10 <br /> <br />Results <br /> <br /> <br />Transect results <br /> <br />CLAY LOAM. 1'83 (()o7l)dS M' <br /> <br />A summary of soil, ground-water and vegetation conditions in each stratum of each <br />transect is in Fig. 4. The predominant soil type over all transects was sandy loam. BC of <br />most soil samples was low (mean = 0'65 dSm-I). From November 1999 to February <br />2000 groundwater was shallow (1-2 m) at all stations, but a salinity gradient was <br />apparent from south to north within the native tree zone, with ground-water BC's <br />ranging from 1.4 to 4'4 dS m - I for well points within the native tree zone. (Two well <br />points placed below the junction with the Hardy River at Campo Munoz had water of <br />9'7 dS m - I). Ground-water in general was saltier (higher BC) than river water <br />(1' 2 dS m - ]), presumably due to evaporation, the influence of saline subsurface drain- <br />age from adjacent agricultural fields and to the flushing of salts from the soil surface to <br />the groundwater by flood waters. <br />Five plant species were commonly encountered in study plots (Fig. 4): T. ramosissima, <br />a mid-story species (up to 6 m height); Pluchea sericea (arrowweed), a salHolerant <br />shrub; Baccharis salicifolia (seepwillow), a mesophytic shrub; S. gooddingii and <br />P. fremontii trees, that were present in all size classes but were the only species above <br />6 m height; and the emergent, aquatic grass, Phragmites australis (common reed), found <br />along the water line on three transects where the channel had not entrenched. Prosopis <br />pubescens (screwbean mesquite tree) was locally abundant in some parts of the floodplain <br />but was not encountered in the transects. Felger et al. (1998) provide a complete flora of <br />the delta. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />j 5 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />SILTY LOAM. &33 (()o12) cIS M- <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br />Figure 4. Vegetation distribution along nine transects in the Colorado River delta, Mexico. The <br />location of the transects along the river (y-axis) and length of each transect (x-axis) are shown <br />schematically in the upper left hand graph. Some transects were divided into separate zones, results <br />of which are shown separately in the pictographs that follow. The locator graph also shows whether <br />transects were on the east or west side of the river channel. Symbols for individual plant types are <br />shown in the upper right hand box using common names. In the graphs showing results for each <br />zone, the height of the plant symbols indicates plant height (y-axis), while the width of the plant <br />stand indicates % cover. Over each set of plant symbols, % cover (numerator) and density in plants <br />per ha (denominator) is given. Near the name of each transect, the % covered by bare soil is given. <br />The x-axis also indicates the length of the zone in meters, and under the x-axis, the soil type and, to <br />the right, mean and standard error of soil EC in I : 1 extracts is given. In those transect with well <br />points, the mean and standard error of EC readings in the water table is given under the x-axis near <br />the origin to the left of soil type. Note that well points indicated as in the Caranza transect were <br />actually several kilometers distant (see Fig. 1). <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />1'4~(&19)cIS M.I SILTYiA'M.0-23(0-12)clSM-~ m <br /> <br />2'67~I'15)cIS M-' LOo\M.0-.43 (O-40)dS M" 83.. <br /> <br />J! J'ji <br />ll,tl'o# <br />", i ~l <br /> <br />c;. <br />CJ <br />W <br />l''':' <br /> <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />CD <br /> <br />SANDY LOAM. &30 (&30) cIS M-' 92 m <br /> <br />Nol1b of Railrvad Zone J Soil- 35',3% <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />9"8% <br />3i43 <br /> <br />54-9% <br />i4.i2i <br /> <br /> <br />SANDY LOAM. &37 (0-29) cIS M-I <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />North of Railroad 2Dnc II Soil- 35-3% <br />76'4"'. <br />lli8 <br /> <br />SANDY LOAM. 1'45 (&07) cIS M-' 102 m <br /> <br /> <br />462m <br /> <br />CLAY. 5~ (S~) cIS M- <br /> <br />12'3m <br /> <br /> <br />0'10 <br />m <br /> <br />5S4 m 2-58(~.80) cIS M"SILTY LOAM. 0-.10 (D-30) dS M-'S6 m <br />10 <br /> <br />i 5 <br />:IE <br /> <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />3703'10 <br />3O:2i6 <br />LOo\My SAND. &23 cIS MO' 38 m <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />LOAMY SAND. D-24 (0'06) lIS M-' 1422 m <br />