Laserfiche WebLink
<br />44 <br /> <br />M. J, COHEN ET AL. <br /> <br />Source <br /> <br />Table 2. RelUl11 flows to the Colorado Rive,' lIIainSlem below Morelos Dam., <br />1992-1998. Mean anllual discharge (10" 111") <br /> <br />Non-flood years Flood years <br /> <br />KM 27 wasteway <br />San Luis Rio Colorado effluent nr. Km 27 <br />KM 38 wasteway <br />Colector del Sur drain <br />Principal del Sur drain <br />Total return flows to the river (Q,r) <br /> <br />22 <br />12 <br />1.3 <br />11 <br />24 <br />70 <br /> <br />220 <br />12 <br />6,5 <br />12 <br />29 <br />280 <br /> <br />Table 3. \ValeI' balllllce /01' lhe Colorad!) River mainSlem belo~l' Morclos Dam, <br />1992-1998. Mean annual discharge (106 nr') <br /> <br />Inflows and outflows <br /> <br />Non-flood years <br /> <br />Flood years <br /> <br />Wasteways al.Limitl'ophe* <br />Discharge at upstream boundary (Q",) <br />Return flows to the river (Q,r) <br />Precipitation (P) <br />Tributary inflow (T,) <br />Evaporation from open water surfaces (E) <br />Evapotranspiration (ET) <br />Change in aquifer storage (LlS.) <br />Discharge to Laguna Salada sub-basin (Q,~) <br />Discharge at the downstream boundary (QdJ <br />Residual <br /> <br />3,0 <br />28.3 <br />70 <br />0.2 <br />0,6 <br />4 <br />9 <br />5 <br />o <br />26 <br />56 <br /> <br />3'1 <br />2620 <br />280 <br />0'2 <br />0'5 <br />270 <br />9 <br />460 <br />200 <br />2200 <br />- 240 <br /> <br />.. Ifl<lSI€U'<IJ'S <I' Limill'Of>he aggregates the records of the three wasteways that discharge into the Iimitrnphc: <br />these flows are included as parI of the 'Tolal al SIB', <br /> <br />below the SIB, and consumption of surface water by other vegetation, or errors in the <br />calculated Qds' Most notable is the difference, of two orders of magnitude, in <br />discharge at the upstre~lm houndary, Evaporation from open water surfaces and change <br />in storage hoth rdicl:t the cft~cts of inundation of the floodplain, which greatly <br />increased the potential 1111' inliltration and evaporation, Change in storage here repres- <br />ents only gains. and does not retlect losses due to phreatophytes, sub-surface flows, or <br />other fal:tors. Evapotranspiration only reflects that of emergent wetland vegetation; <br />mean annual ET 11)1' the mainstem was estimated at 210 x ]Obm-'. <br />Table 4 shows the values for the variables in the water balance equation for the <br />Cienega de Smml Clara for the years ]992-1998, The estimated losses to MODE <br />discharge due to evaporatilm and seepage between t11e SIB and the Cienega <br />(0'39 x 10 mt'year" I) represent less than 0,4% of total discharge and were not included <br />in the water balance. In 1993, discharge t11rough t11e MODE was disrupted by the Gila <br />River flood event. Total recorded discharge at the SIB in the bypass extension that year <br />was 75,8 x lOb In'', In ] 993, Wellton-Mohawk ceased discharging to the MODE on 2] <br />February (contributing 2S% of total annual discharge). From 21 February through 30 <br />May the MODE contained Gila floodwaters (S8eX, of total discharge); discharge from 31 <br />May to 4 November were from Yuma Valley ground-water wells (17%), and for <br />t11e remainder of the year the discharge consisted of San Luis, Arizona effluent <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />WATER BAlANCE FOR THE COLORADO RIVER DELTA <br /> <br />,I'. <br /> <br />Table 4. WaleI' balance/Ol'llte Ciellega de Sallla Clara, 1992-/998 <br /> <br />Inflows and outflows <br /> <br />]0"11)' <br /> <br />Discharge at upstream boundary (Q"s) <br />Return flow (Qrl) <br />Precipitation (P) <br />Tributary inflow ('1',) <br />Evaporation from open water surfaces (E) <br />Evapotranspiration (ET) <br />Change in aquifer storage (LlS.,) <br />Discharge at the downstream boundary (Qd') <br /> <br />128 <br />16 <br />2 <br />o <br />84 <br />60 <br />2 <br />o <br /> <br />w <br /> <br />c-,,~. <br />c::;:; <br />~"l' <br />t"",1 <br /> <br />Table S. WaleI' bakmcc/or El India W'elkmds., 1992-1998 <br />Inflows and outflows <br /> <br />lOb m3 <br /> <br />Discharge at upstream boundary (Q"s) <br />Return flow (Qrr) <br />Precipitation (P) <br />Tributary inflow ('1',.) <br />Evaporation from open wllter surfaces (E) <br />Evapotranspiration (ET) <br />Change in aquifer storage (LlS.) <br />Discharge at the downstream boundary (Qd') <br /> <br />18 <br />o <br />0,2 <br />o <br />] <br />4 <br />3 <br />]0 <br /> <br />(. <] 'X.) (I~~C, 1993). The interruption in flows through the MODE decreased the <br />size of the C1enega and led to the mortality of 60-70% of the marsh foliage (Zengel et al <br />1995). " <br /> <br />Arte'sian spr,in~s at the soutll-eastern edge of t11e delta sustain pocket wetlands, many <br />of extremely hmlted area yet supporting greater plant diversity (Ezcurra et ai., 1988) <br />than the w~tlands sustained by agricultural drainage (Luecke el aI" 1999). Glenn et al. <br />(] 996) estimate that these artesian springs discharge approximately] 07 m' year - I. <br />Table 5 ~hows the mean annual values for t11e variables in the water balance equation <br />ro~ El Indlo ,,:etlands for the years ] 992-1998. The Plan de Ayala drain, serving <br />Irngated areas 111 the San Luis valley, discharges to a point behind the levee on the left <br />bank of the Colora~o River. CNA records for this drain served as discharge at the <br />upstream boundary for tl1e system. The results of the mass balance equation for EI Indio <br />reflect t11e limited data available and uncertainty regarding the fate of water entering t11C <br />system. Qd' was derived from the mass balance. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Discharge t11rough the delta, and particularly through the mainstem Colorado River-Rill <br />Hardy C()n1plex, demonstrated marked variability between flood and non-flood years, <br />Flood years also showed greater discharge tl) tile mainstem from wasteways 11I1d <br />agricultural drains relative to non-flood years, consistent with increased deliv~ries lIr <br />Colorado River water to Mexico in these years, As a result of increased surface arell dlll' <br />