|
<br />26
<br />
<br />J. C.STROMBERG
<br />
<br />to fully respond to daily power demands. In the long-term, efforts are needed to
<br />shift to more sustainable energy sources such as solar power and thereby eliminate the
<br />need for peaking power from hydro-power dams.
<br />
<br />Physical barriers
<br />
<br />Dikes, levees, and other structures separate channels from flood plains on many streams.
<br />To remedy this situation on California's Cosumnes River, the Nature Conservancy has
<br />implemented a large-scale restoration project that entails breaching levees and allowing
<br />flood waters free access to abandoned farm land (Reiner, 2000). Potential for success
<br />was demonstrated by a natural breaching of the levee about 10 years ago, which was
<br />followed by development of a diverse riparian forest. Restoration efforts also have
<br />been made in urban areas to reconnect rivers and flood plains (Riley, 1998; de Waal
<br />et al., 1998). There are opportunities to remove physical barriers and restore some
<br />degree of channel-flood plain connectivity along many desert streams, including the
<br />Colorado and Rio Grande. By allowing periodic flows onto flood plains, one provides
<br />the water, nutrients, sediments, and plant propagules to restore and sustain productive,
<br />diverse riparian forests (Molles et al., 1998). Such efforts may require purchase of
<br />agricultural land for conservation purposes, or restrictions on home development in
<br />flood plains. Benefits accrue, however, in the form of downstream flood reduction (as
<br />the flood waters spread laterally across the flood plain), aquifer recharge, and biodiver-
<br />sity increases.
<br />
<br />High concentrations of dissolved solids
<br />
<br />Primary causes of the increased salinity of Colorado River water, as for many other
<br />streams, are use of flood plain lands for irrigated agriculture and storage of water in
<br />shallow reservoirs (Briggs & Cornelius, 1998). Water chemistry can be improved to
<br />levels that support a wide range of riparian plant species, including fresh-water depen-
<br />dent Populus and Salix, by reducing amounts of irrigated flood plain lands, increasing
<br />efficiency of irrigation systems, growing low-water-use crops, and/or reducing use
<br />of agricultural fertilizers. Reducing reliance on reservoirs for water storage will result in
<br />less evaporation of water and thus lower salinity levels. Released of flood pulses from
<br />dams can flush salts that have accumulated in flood plain soils.
<br />
<br />Flood flow alteration
<br />
<br />On many streams in western United States and Canada, recruitment rates of Populus
<br />and Salix species have declined because floods have been suppressed or altered in ways
<br />that do not meet their regeneration requirements. To remedy this situation in Alberta,
<br />Canada, scientists and Environmental Advisory Committees have provided information
<br />that has led to changed operation of some dams (Rood el al., 1995, 1998; Mahoney
<br />& Rood, 1998). St. Mary and Oldman Rivers are managed for delivery of summer
<br />irrigation water and still flood fairly regularly in wet years, Rates of river meandering
<br />and channel realignment are relatively unaltered, and so 'are the processes that create
<br />'nursery bars' for establishment of Populus seedlings. Changes have been made, how-
<br />ever, such that flood waters now recede slowly enough to allow for high survival of the
<br />seedlings. Ecological models call for the stream stage to drop less than four cm per day,
<br />allowing seedling roots to maintain contact with moist soil: Another part of the agree-
<br />ment calls for an increase in summer base flow levels, thereby reducing risk of tree death
<br />from drought,
<br />
<br />
<br />RESTORATION OF RIPARIAN VEGETATION OF FLOW REGIME
<br />
<br />27
<br />
<br />. Such operating agreements could be put in place for the many flow-regulated streams
<br />10 the south-western United States, including the Verde, Gila, and Colorado Rivers.
<br />Large flows are released ~rom wa~er-storag.e dams on these streams during occasional
<br />wet ye~rs, but the water !S not released so as to optimize its environmental benefits.
<br />Sometunes, relea~es fortu1tously meet the reg~neration needs of riparian plants. EI Nino
<br />weather patterns 10 1978, 1.983 and 1993 vanously allowed for establishment of Populus
<br />and Salzx trees along portions of the lower Gila and Colorado; reservoirs were filled
<br />to . levels that n~cess1tated large releases during winter and spring (Rea, 1983;
<br />~nggs & Cornelius, 1998; Zamora-Arroyo el aI., 2001). With operating agreements
<br />In plac~, ~am managers could be prepared to release flows during wet years in ways
<br />that muruc natural hydrographs and favor establishment of native species adapted to
<br />natural flow patterns. To keep the trees alive, maintenance flows would have to be
<br />secured.
<br />Often, there ~re ~o~strain~s o~ the degree to which natural flood regimes can be
<br />restore? The ~~I ~dliams R1ver 1~ western Arizona is regulated by Alamo Dam, which
<br />was built tonumnuz~ flood pulses mto the Colorado River. Over the past 25 years, size
<br />and frequency of wmter and summer flood peaks in the Bill Williams River have
<br />de.cre~sed. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Army Corps of Engineers, and university
<br />sC1e';ltlsts have worked together to develop a flow-release plan. The plan calls for release
<br />of high base flow~ a~d periodic fl<?od flows t~ UJ:t~rove the quality of riparian habitat in
<br />th.e b~low-dam w~ldlife refuge, whde also maIntaInIng flood control and recreational and
<br />wildlife benefits 10 Alamo Lake. However, there are physical constraints and design
<br />features that res~ct the size of fl~od pulses that can be released from the dam (Shafroth
<br />~I al., ~001). ~lthO~t large ~counng floods, dense post-dam vegetation (much of which
<br />IS exotlc Ta~aTlx) w1ll ~emaln ~e-I:'rone. Another anticipated consequence of the lack of
<br />larg~ SCOUrIng floods 1S a decline 10 rates of establishment of pioneering Populus and
<br />Sal~. These rates are predicted to decline despite the release of appropriately timed
<br />spn?g flow~ (~hafroth et al., 1998). Solutions being pursued at the Bill Wiilliim1s
<br />Nanonal Wildlife Refuge are intervention in the form of small-sc81e clearing of Tamizrix
<br />to be followed by Populus-Salix regeneration flows. '
<br />. ~~ons that mimic. fluvial processes, such as flood plain ~learing followed by flood
<br />IITlgatlon, also are bemg undertaken at other sites where natural processes cannot be
<br />fully restored (Friedman el aI., 1995). For example, at Bosque del Apache Wildlife
<br />Refuge" as on much of New Mexico's highly regulated Rio Grande Tamarix has
<br />become dominant. Lowered water tables, increased river salinity, and lack of win-
<br />ter/sI:'ring floods have all contrib~ted t~ decline of Populus forests, while past flood plain
<br />c1eanng and at least one appropnately timed summer flood allowed for influx of T amarix
<br />(Everitt, 1998). To restore native forests, Refuge managers have mimicked the ef-
<br />fects of large floods by using bulldozers, herbicides, and fire to clear extensive stands of
<br />Tamarix at a cost of$750-1300 ha-I (Taylor & McDaniel, 1998; Taylor et aJ.., 1999).
<br />T?e~ then released water onto the bare flood plains in spring with a seasonal timing that
<br />mlnucked the natural flood hydrograph of the Rio Grande. This allowed for establish-
<br />ment of a diverse assemblage of plant species. Flood pulsing followed by seeding of
<br />native species also can be undertaken on agricultural fields, as has been done at places
<br />along the lower Colorado River. Restoration of agricultural fields ultimately may prove
<br />more cost-effective than restoration of Tamarix lands. Although land costs may be
<br />high, water delivery structures already are in place and vegetation clearing costs are
<br />negligible.
<br />
<br />C:;:'.
<br />C::,'
<br />C,.I..')
<br />f' .;,
<br />i;.;::>
<br />.......
<br />
<br />Loss of sediment
<br />
<br />Dams and reservoirs impede downstream flows of sediment. Reduced transport of silt
<br />and clay may reduce biodiversity below dam~, given that abundance of herbaceous
<br />
|