My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3 Difference between the Proposed Legislation
CWCB
>
IBCC Process Program Material
>
Backfile
>
3 Difference between the Proposed Legislation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 6:00:46 PM
Creation date
7/26/2007 2:17:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
IBCC Process Program Material
Title
Colorado’s Interbasin Compact Negotiations: Development of an Institutional Framework - Difference Between the Proposed Legislation and the Internal Draft
Date
12/17/2004
Author
Russell George, Frank McNulty, Peter Nichols, Eric Hecox
IBCC - Doc Type
Program Planning, Budget & Contracts
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revised: 7/26/2007 <br />Difference between the Proposed Legislation and the Internal Draft <br /> <br /> <br />The Steering Committee <br />The proposed legislation does not include an explicit statement directing the Steering <br />Committee to have broad representation. The internal draft directs the Gover nor to use <br />his at - large appointments to ensure the Steering Committee includes environmental, <br />municipal, agricultural, industrial, and recreational representatives. <br /> <br /> <br />Basin Roundtables <br />The proposed legislation does not include an explicit statement that th e SWSI roundtables <br />will be the starting point, but membership can change. This principle is implied, as the <br />proposed legislation gives the Basin Roundtables the responsibility to “set their own rules <br />for membership selection and adopt operational by - laws. ” <br /> <br />The proposed legislation does not provide additional details on the Basin Roundtables <br />responsibility to “provide a forum for on - going basin collaboration.” The internal draft <br />includes some details on on - going basin collaboration and the option of engag ing in a <br />basin - wide planning process. <br /> <br /> <br />Public Education/Outreach <br />The proposed legislation does not direct this working group to coordinate and work <br />collaboratively with the Colorado Water Education Foundation. <br /> <br /> <br />Interbasin Compact Negotiations <br />The propose d legislation does not mention that the end result might be a referred <br />constitutional amendment. The internal draft indicates that compact negotiations may <br />result in a compact that will be ratified by a vote of the citizens, implemented through a <br />constitu tional amendment, and administered by a compact commission. <br /> <br />The proposed legislation does not explicitly direct the Steering Committee to provide <br />facilitators during the negotiation process to help resolve conflicts. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.