My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9 IAD Framework
CWCB
>
IBCC Process Program Material
>
Backfile
>
9 IAD Framework
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 6:00:55 PM
Creation date
7/26/2007 1:53:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
IBCC Process Program Material
Title
Colorado’s Interbasin Compact Negotiations: Development of an Institutional Framework - IAD Framework
Date
12/17/2004
Author
Russell George, Frank McNulty, Peter Nichols, Eric Hecox
IBCC - Doc Type
Program Planning, Budget & Contracts
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revised: 7/26/2007 <br />1 <br />Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) Framework <br /> <br /> <br />Action Situation <br /> <br />Consists of three broad and interrelated components: <br />? <br /> <br />Physical environment – in natural resource this includes the physical environment <br />of land, water, air, biota, and biophysical p rocesses <br />? <br /> <br />Actors and their behavior – includes both individuals and organizations <br /> <br />It is important to make assumptions about the expected behavior patterns <br />o <br />of these actors: the adaptive problem - solver; the rational decision maker; <br />and/or the socialized and r ule - bound actor <br />? <br /> <br />Institutional rules – Institutional rules are the primary focus because institutional <br />rules are explicitly human creation subject to deliberate modification through <br />individual and/or collective action. <br /> <br />Natural resource or environmental pro blems can be solved by manipulating one or more <br />of these three elements. Societies typically look towards manipulation of the physical <br />environment first, because it is less controversial, less difficult, and less uncertain than <br />attempts to manipulate beha vior. Examples include cutting trees and building dams. <br />Typically, technological fixes can only be pursued after significant institutional reforms. <br />Often the best long - term solutions are those based on manipulating the behavior of <br />resource users, discou raging problem - causing actions while promoting problem - solving <br />behaviors. Again, these types of solutions cannot normally be pursued without first <br />modifying institutional rules. <br /> <br />Institutional Rules and Levels <br /> <br />There are seven types of institutional rul es : scope, position, boundary, authority, <br />information, aggregation, and payoff. <br /> <br />There are three general institutional levels : <br />? <br /> <br />Operational choice – Decisions made at this level directly determine how resource <br />are used. <br />? <br /> <br />Collective choice – Operational choic e rules are made and revised at this level. <br />? <br /> <br />Constitutional choice – Highest decision - making level. Not generally considered <br />to be open to change. <br /> <br />In an analysis, the seven rules are applied to the three levels in a bottom - up fashion. The <br />seven rules tha t comprise the operational level should first be investigated and described. <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> Elinor Ostrom developed the IAD framework. The information in this document is taken from an <br />integration of the IAD framework with other concepts as articulated by Kenney and Lord. See Kenney, <br />Douglas S. and William B. Lord. Analysis of Institutional Innovation in the Natural Resource and <br />Environmental Realm: The Emergence of Alternative Problem - Solving Strategies in the American West . <br />Natural Resource Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law, Research Report (RR - 21), 1999. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.