Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1949, and 1952. Such events were includ.ed in the rainflood record, which then is not completely <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />independent of snowmelt. <br /> <br /> T:<lble 18 <br /> Comparison Table of 1 % Rainflood Peak Flows (cfs) <br /> Dolores River below Rico, <br /> Dolores River at Dolores, and Dolores River below Lost Canyon Creek <br /> Estimated Peak Flow for 1 % Event (cfs) <br /> Source Dolores River below Dolores River at Dolores River below <br /> Rico Dolores Lost Canyon Creek <br />2004 Flood Insurance Study: Hydrology <br /> Frequency Curve (Rain flood) 2,440 11,700 N/A <br /> HMS Model 2,290 11,700 12,300 <br /> Frequency Curve (Snowmelt) 2,730 8,200 N/A <br />1976 Flood Hazard Information: Hydrology <br />(Reference 4-d) N/A . N/A 14,500 <br />2000 USGS Report 99-4190 <br />(Reference 4-m) 2,650 9,980 (I) N/A <br /> IFrequency Curve <br />2003 USBR McPhee Report <br />(Reference 4-0) 2Frequency Curve N/A N/A 12,250 (2) <br />I All events (rain and snow) frequency curve <br />2 McPhee Reservoir 1 % Peak Inflow <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Table 19 presents a tabulation of rain flood and snowmelt frequencies for the 0.2%, 1 %,2% and <br /> <br />10% chance exceedence for Dolores River below Rico, Dolores at Dolores, and Lost Canyon <br /> <br />Creek near Dolores gage locations as see on Plates 12, 14, 16, 18, and 22. Table 20 is a summary <br /> <br />of Peak Flow 1 % Exceedence for the 2004 Flood Insurance Study, Dolores River near Dolores. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />36 <br />