Laserfiche WebLink
Concept Paper for Roundtable Cap a city Building <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />Approach to the capacity building <br /> . This proposal is founded on the following <br /> approaches: <br /> <br /> 1. The capacity building assistance for Roundtable s is encourage d but not mandated; <br /> Roundtable s have control. <br />The c apacity <br /> <br /> 2. The capacity building process will be co - designed or approved by all key <br />b uilding effort <br /> should not in any participating entities. <br />way infringe <br /> <br /> 3. Capacity building efforts will not in any lessen the power and authority of the <br />upon the power <br /> Roundtable s or Roundtable Chairs t o direct their own actions. <br />and authority of <br /> <br /> 4. Capacity building will begin in a small group of Roundtable s (for example, two <br />Roundtable s of <br /> or three Roundtable s) as a pilot initiative. If participatory evaluations completed <br />their C hairs. <br /> by Roundtable members demonstrate a benefit from the process, th e approach <br /> could be expanded to other Roundtable s that wish this assistance. <br /> <br /> 5. By working in the context of actual Roundtable work tasks, time is not spent on <br /> abstract training. The capacity building, to the greatest extent feasible, will occur <br /> in the contex t of the work that the Roundtable has already undertaken and has <br /> planned to complete. <br /> <br /> 6. The pilot program will be evaluated and successes and challenges/lessons shared <br /> with other Roundtable s. Roundtable members, DNR and CDM could evaluate the <br /> process and doc ument the results of the pilots. <br />Using two or <br /> <br />Selection of two or three Roundtable s for the pilot initiative . <br />three Roundtable <br /> <br />This Concept Paper envisions selecting and then asking two or three Roundtables to <br />to test the <br /> <br />pilot this capacity building effort. If pilots are successful, other Round tables may <br />capacity building <br /> <br />decide to participate also. <br />effort can: (1) <br /> <br />avoid waste so <br /> <br /> <br />DNR can <br />T here are several considerations in selecting the Roundtable s for the pilot program. <br /> <br />determine <br />These could include selection of a specific Roun d table because : <br /> <br />whether to <br />(a) A Roundtable that is approaching a complex decision; <br /> <br />replicate it; and <br />(b) A R oundtable that is experiencing conflict that impedes productive work; <br /> (2) improve the <br /> <br />(c) T wo Roundtable s that are moving toward greater need for collaboration between <br />process through <br /> <br />them ; or, <br />participant <br /> <br />(d) A Roundtable seems highly motivated to gain these skills. <br />evaluation . <br /> <br />Other options <br />. Although this C o ncept P aper suggests using a pilot approach (using <br /> <br />two or three Roundtable s to test the process), there are other approaches that could be <br /> <br />used or combined, as follows: <br /> <br />A w orkshop of all Roundtable members on the concepts – a training workshop . <br /> <br />? <br /> <br />A workshop for Roundtable Chairs. <br /> <br />? <br /> <br />Offering capacity building to all Roundtables rather than using a pilot process. <br /> <br />? <br /> <br /> <br />Monitoring Roundtable member satisfaction. <br /> One approach to participatory <br /> <br />evaluation would be to place monthly or bimonthly on - line surveys that Roundtab le <br /> <br />members could take to evaluate the capacity building services. These could be short <br /> <br />(5 minutes or less) questionnaire on an IBCC website. <br /> <br />Implementation steps and requirements . <br />The approach to this Concept could be in <br /> <br />the follow ing sequence : <br /> <br /> <br />1. Test the Co ncept within DNR. <br /> <br /> <br />2. Test the Concept within key personnel at CDM and CDR. <br /> <br /> <br />