My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended
CWCB
>
IBCC Process Program Material
>
Backfile
>
2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 6:00:42 PM
Creation date
7/25/2007 1:21:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
IBCC Process Program Material
Title
2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended
IBCC - Doc Type
Legislation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended <br /> <br />Page 6 of 49 <br /> <br />that request, as well as this bill and how the two overlap or how <br />they don't. So, if you'd like to comment on that, that might be <br />helpful for us. <br /> <br />Rep. PeJ1JY: <br /> <br />I'd be happy to. Obviously I think a critical component of this <br />dialogue going forward is to find a meaningful way to integrate the <br />SWSI process with this process. I know Representative Hoppe <br />carried that bill, has shown a great deal of leadership and the <br />generated data that is going to be critical to whatever process we <br />use to begin the effort of meeting our needs; whatever that <br />ultimately looks like. <br /> <br />I actually received a letter from a member of the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board, one of the directors who had some interesting <br />ideas. I'll get a copy of his testimony and circulate it. I don't <br />know if its been circulated already. But he had some interesting <br />ideas about how we might want to mesh SWSI in this innovation <br />compact process together. <br /> <br />But his observation was that in terms of identifying ways to meet <br />our water needs that the model in 1177 is a good way to make sure <br />it's sort of a bottom up approach, rather than the alternative. But <br />it's an issue that we are going to have to decide on, I think as a <br />committee going forward is this bill on this floor. <br /> <br />Madam Chair: <br /> <br />I guess I don't feel like the question's answered yet, but I'm glad <br />you want to talk about it. <br /> <br />Rep. PeJ1JY: <br /> <br />Well, I think we have to integrate it and how we do that, I think, <br />there's a range of options. For example, you could incorporate <br />members of the CWCB into the basin roundtables themselves. His <br />recommendations, this gentleman's recommendations on the <br />CWCB was to let them chair the basin roundtables so that there <br />was continuity between the first phase of SWSI and the next phase <br />of actually identifying projects and methods for meeting our water <br />needs. That's one idea. <br /> <br />The other idea is to involve them at the inter-basin compact <br />committee level, the statewide level, again to ensure that CWCB <br />has a strong and active voice and you don't lose continuity or you <br />don't lose all that was gained in the first phase of the SWSI <br />process. <br /> <br />Madam Chair: Representative Penry, when I brought up this issue before you had <br />a really good response about timing and how this approach is more <br />of a long-term effort, whereas the statewide water supply <br /> <br />www.escriptionist.com Page 6 of 49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.