My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended
CWCB
>
IBCC Process Program Material
>
Backfile
>
2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 6:00:42 PM
Creation date
7/25/2007 1:21:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
IBCC Process Program Material
Title
2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended
IBCC - Doc Type
Legislation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended <br /> <br />Page 32 of 49 <br /> <br />Now the Northern District under the Conservancy Act has been <br />forced to do that on two different occasions. I can assure you it <br />was not a smooth process. It took a lot of time, a lot of effort, but I <br />think the results that came out of it were very favorable to the state <br />of Colorado. I think this bill represents that same type of effort. <br /> <br />There's not a basin in the state that doesn't have something it <br />needs and probably would be willing to bring something to the <br />table to negotiate that. Water management alternatives are needed <br />out there. We've all seen the results of the SWSI report and they <br />are somewhat alarming. Those alternatives need to be pursued and <br />we need to enter into Colorado's future with some certainty. <br /> <br />A few of the things that concern us in regard to this bill is it's <br />important to craft these compacts in a way that there's not a <br />seniority to those compacts. We've got seven basins within the <br />state of Colorado and there's a number of permutations of <br />compacts between the individual basins. We don't want to have a <br />first in time, first in right with regard to these compacts. So as <br />they're formulated I think it's very impOliant that they stand alone <br />and one compact doesn't affect the other compact. After all, the <br />concept behind compacts are really doctrines of equitable <br />apportionment. <br /> <br />That's the very reason that Delph Carpenter entered into the <br />negotiations in the Colorado River basin because he was scared to <br />death of the doctrine of prior appropriations as it may pertain to <br />distribution of water or apportionment of water amongst the states. <br />So as we go into this concept, I think it's very important to keep <br />that in place. <br /> <br />Also, as a member of the Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />representing the South Platt basin, I would like to see this effort <br />parallel the efforts that the Colorado Water Conservation Board is <br />doing with SWSI. I think SWSI plays a very important role, as <br />Director Russell said, in providing the data and the real foundation <br />it's going to take to move this effort forward. <br /> <br />I would hate to see, as is implied in some areas of this legislation, <br />that these basin roundtables under the authority of this legislation <br />do a repetition or an overview of basin needs an desires in addition <br />to what's been done with SWSI. SWSI was put in place to do that <br />and I think this type of legislation may invoke people to come to <br />the SWSI effort and be more forthright in what they need so that <br /> <br />www.escriptionist.com <br /> <br />Page 32 of 49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.