My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended
CWCB
>
IBCC Process Program Material
>
Backfile
>
2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 6:00:42 PM
Creation date
7/25/2007 1:21:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
IBCC Process Program Material
Title
2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended
IBCC - Doc Type
Legislation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2-07 House Committee Lay Over Unamended <br /> <br />Page 15 of 49 <br /> <br />studies from the 50s, the 60s, the 70s. I could've merely just <br />updated the language and republished them and nobody would <br />know any different. So what? <br /> <br />Well I think so what is we haven't gained much. We haven't made <br />too much progress on some of the fundamental water issues that <br />have faced the state of Colorado since it started growing very <br />rapidly in the 1950s. <br /> <br />As you know first hand there have been countless legislative <br />proposals to "solve Colorado's water needs." There have been <br />many referred and initiated measures as well. None of them have <br />really passed. Why is this? Well my personal view is is because <br />they've been piece mealed. They've solved one group's problems <br />and issues at the expense of another or proposed to solve one <br />group's problems and issues at the expense of another. I think it's <br />time to try a new approach. <br /> <br />Privately every water professional I've talked to in the past five <br />years agree that we fundamentally need to change the way we <br />approach water issues in the state of Colorado. A model we have <br />not tried for some reason is one Colorado initiated; the one that <br />Russ George just talked about and that is a model that worked very <br />successfully to solve some very imminent and very serious <br />interstate water wars at the beginning of the last century. <br /> <br />The Colorado River was not over-appropriated when the compact <br />was negotiated in 1922, many of the other rivers in which we <br />entered a compacts were. The fact that this state is over- <br />appropriated in many basins is not a reason why this can't work <br />here now. <br /> <br />This is a very difficult challenge. There's lots of reasons it won't <br />be successful. I'm sure you're going to hear many of them today. <br />I'm sure you've probably all heard many of them already. <br /> <br />There are very different interests involved in the water rights in the <br />state of Colorado and everybody wants to protect theirs. There are <br />geographic differences. There are economic differences. There <br />are piece meal needs. There are urban needs, mral needs, ag <br />needs, environmental needs. Many of these have been addressed <br />in the past; many of them have not. <br /> <br />There's lots of reasons why we must be successful at this. We live <br />in an aired state. Growth continues; it will continue. The urban <br />front range demands will grow. They will need more water. <br /> <br />www.escriptionist.com <br /> <br />Page 15 of 49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.