My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3-24 House Second Reading
CWCB
>
IBCC Process Program Material
>
Backfile
>
3-24 House Second Reading
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 6:00:48 PM
Creation date
7/25/2007 1:04:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
IBCC Process Program Material
Title
3-24 House Second Reading
IBCC - Doc Type
Legislation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3-24 House Second Reading <br /> <br />Page 6 of 13 <br /> <br />House Bill 1177 is that it sets up a forum for having discussions <br />regarding these really, really difficult issues. <br /> <br />This is not gonna make me or anybody from mral Colorado many <br />friends I have to say. Because it moves us beyond where we're at <br />right now. But the State of Colorado does need to move forward <br />on these issues. I think Representative Penry has worked hard to <br />make sure that the bill isn't too far-reaching. <br /> <br />It still makes me very nervous, Representative Penry, but I think if <br />we don't have these discussion, in the end mral Colorado will <br />actually end up worse off because our voice won't be heard, and it <br />won't be fair, and this attempts to set up a fair process for us. So, <br />I'd like to continue to hear from other members to see what we <br />think about this, but this is a really important piece of legislation <br />and I am continuing to support it at this time. <br /> <br />Mr. Chairman: <br /> <br />Representative Penry <br /> <br />Rep. PelllY <br /> <br />Thank you Mr. Chairman and thank you Madame Chair Curry for <br />making those statements. I come from Grand Junction, Colorado, <br />western Colorado. If this bill weren't good for mral Colorado, tmst <br />me, I would not be standing here. I think this bill gets at the notion <br />that dialogue and progress is impOliant for all of us whether we <br />live in western Colorado or whether we live in the Denver area or <br />other parts of the front range. <br /> <br />And it's also important to note the safeguards that are in this bill. <br />Once we get to the point of negotiations, no Compact, no <br />agreement, no product of these negotiations can be ratified or <br />finalized until the local basin says okay. They have final and <br />definitive say. And so there are very strong protections, both <br />procedurally and in terms of who's sitting at the table. Rural <br />Colorado is represented very well in this process and will have a <br />definitive voice in their roundtables and a very strong and <br />compelling say on happens on the statewide committee as well. <br /> <br />I think there are some, in some parts of the state, I think on both <br />sides of the Continental Divide who don't want necessarily a <br />dialogue that, stalemate is serving their purposes, and I don't think <br />that's good or responsible for our fi.lture. I think this bill will help <br />solve the stalemate. And so for that reason, I think it's as good and <br />important for western Colorado as it is for those of you on this side <br />of the mountain. <br /> <br />Mr. Chairmall: Representative Hoppy <br /> <br />www.escriptionist.com Page 6 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.