My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4-14 Senate Committee
CWCB
>
IBCC Process Program Material
>
Backfile
>
4-14 Senate Committee
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2009 6:00:51 PM
Creation date
7/25/2007 1:01:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
IBCC Process Program Material
Title
4-14 Senate Committee
IBCC - Doc Type
Legislation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4-14 Senate Committee <br />Interviewer, Interviewee <br /> <br />Page 2 of 37 <br /> <br />come together and try to mutually agree to projects that are <br />beneficial and we've done that interbasin and intrabasin. Two <br />years ago we created the Statewide Water Supply Initiative and I <br />think that was a good step. It's been a good process. We've <br />identified needs within the basins. We've looked at supplies <br />within the basins. We've looked at potential waste redressals on <br />that need. We've looked at potential projects. We've looked at <br />consumptive and non-consumptive uses and I think, I think that's <br />been good. And it's leading us now, really, to what the next step <br />should be. <br /> <br />SWSI, itself, will continue and will continue to try to address those <br />needs. But we need to move into a different, almost, a different <br />mind set to where, now, that we've identified those needs and those <br />supplies and some of the projects; we have to start figuring out <br />how we're going to address those. And to do that, it's helpful to <br />bring people to the table. In some basins, most of the discussion <br />will be about issues within that basin. In other basins, they will <br />have to talk about bringing water in or the potential expOlis of <br />water because some basins; their solution isn't bringing water in. I <br />know the basins are, of course, concerned about water moving out, <br />which will inevitably happen. So, we'll have different concern <br />with different basins, which has been part of the, I think, problem <br />with creating this process; because we have different needs within <br />different basins. <br /> <br />But we are moving into that stage now, where we are going to have <br />to look at how water moves and how projects get built and this will <br />help address that. I think, really, at this point it would probably be <br />helpful if we let Speaker George come up and kind of share his <br />vision of what this can accomplish and then, from there, we'll <br />move into a detailed explanation of the bill. And a fairly lengthy <br />proposed amendment, which we'll walk through in the pre- <br />amended version that we passed out. <br /> <br />Chairman: Are there any questions for the sponsor? Okay, then, we'll move <br />to the public testimony component of the hearing. Russell George, <br />Mr. Speaker, welcome to the Senate Ag., Natural Resources and <br />Energy Committee. Good to see you again. Please identify <br />yourself for the record and proceed. <br /> <br />RlIssell George: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Russell George, Executive Director of <br />the Colorado Department of Natural Resources. Let me spend just <br />a few minutes talking about how, how we got here; both <br />philosophically and then more specifically to the bill itself. And, <br />also, we'll have other folks follow us who can get into the details. <br /> <br />www.escriptionist.com Page 2 of 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.