Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />AYRES <br /> <br />l\GSOC Ets:,~'iES <br /> <br />changes in the basin have altered the recorded flows during the period of the gage <br />from what they would be naturally. These will be adjusted using standard procedures <br />to achieve a proper flow frequency relationship. The emphasis will be on the validity of <br />peak flows that occurred before the construction of Gross Reservoir. This effort will <br />include visiting and inspecting the gage itself, checking its calibration, including the <br />recording of flows higher than 600 cfs, and discussing the gage accuracy with the <br />USGS. <br /> <br />A hydrodynamic model of the Eldorado Springs gage could be developed if the gage <br />data are accurate enough to support this activity and if a hydrodynamic analysis of this <br />reach adds significant information to the hydrology task. The gage data would have to <br />be sufficient for detailed reconstruction of event stage hydrographs for several events <br />that exceed 600 cfs. If a preliminary analysis of the gage data indicates that this item <br />is warranted, then a dynamic HEC-RAS model will be developed for this river reach for <br />approximately 1 mile upstream and downstream of the gage. An inflow hydrograph will <br />be estimated based on the existing stage-discharge rating curve and would be used as <br />input to the model. The inflow hydrographs will be adjusted until the model stage <br />hydrograph at the gage matched the recorded stage hydrograph. This procedure <br />would be conducted for 50 percent of the suitable gaged hydrographs and a revised <br />rating curve would be developed for the gage. The results would be validated using <br />the remaining gage records. This analysis would require additional survey data for this <br />reach. <br /> <br />After adjusting recorded flow values, a statistical analysis on both annual and partial <br />duration flow values will be completed for the two major basin gages (Rollinsville and <br />Eldorado Springs). We do not believe that the data exist to separate mixed events into <br />rainfall and snowmelt only for this evaluation or that this provides particularly <br />meaningful results. <br /> <br />Hydrology - Rainfall-Runoff Modeling <br /> <br />Ayres Associates has reviewed the South Boulder Creek Interim Hydrology Study <br />(Taggart 7/2000) with respect to the completion of a final hydrologic analysis that will <br />be completed integrally with the spatially varied flow hydraulics. The hydrology needs <br />to be fine-tuned and adjusted to provide proper spatial and flow information to the 2- <br />dimensional hydraulic analysis. The final model will reflect future basin conditions. <br />The basic model seems to be well thought out and configured to produce reasonable <br />results. We would suggest using the same UDSWMM model, but are willing to use <br />HEC-HMS if you prefer the use of a different event-based model. Regardless of the <br />model used, we offer the following thoughts to be considered as part of making <br />refinements to the hydrology: <br /> <br />. We understand that there is some concern regarding the peak flows resulting <br />from the rainfall-runoff model being significantly higher than the flows projected <br />from the gaging station data. We believe that the major reason for the <br />difference between the rainfall-runoff modeling results and the statistical <br />evaluation of the gage data is the routing of the floods through Gross Reservoir. <br />This reservoir has a significant and real impact on flood peaks even though it <br />does not have officially allocated flood storage volume. This is, however, an <br />institutional issue that is not only relevant to establishing base line conditions, <br />but also to the future alternatives analysis. This really needs to be resolved as <br /> <br />16 <br />