My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10388 (2)
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10388 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:24:43 AM
Creation date
7/25/2007 10:12:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Stream Name
Gunnison River
Title
Floodplain Information Report - Volume 3 - Gunnison River from Delta to the Confluence of the Colorado River
Date
5/1/1995
Prepared For
Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colo
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />4.3 Field Surveys and Cross-Section Preoaration <br /> <br />The project budget and schedule only allowed for field surveying of three cross-sections on the <br />Gunnison River. The selection of the field-surveyed cross-sections was based on the availability <br />of a nearby benchmark, the accessibility of the location, and the ability to survey the opposite <br />bank. Field estimates were made of the average water depth, but the channel bottoms were not <br />surveyed. Estimations of the Mannings 'n' value were made at each surveyed cross-section <br />location during the field survey. <br /> <br />For some reaches, field-surveyed cross-sections from other stream reaches were transferred to the <br />reach in question. Appropriate adjustments were made to ground elevations. When flow depths <br />were computed, the appropriate slope values, Manning's 'n' values, and flow values were used. <br /> <br />Map-derived cross-sections were utilized for the remaining reaches. Some map-derived cross- <br />sections were modified to more accurately represent actual channel shapes. Canyon reaches on <br />the Gunnison were not generally represented by cross-sections since the level of detail obtained <br />could not be shown on the base maps. There was one exception where a cross-section was used <br />for a canyon reach, and it is discussed below. <br /> <br />The cross-sections used for the computation of flood depths can be grouped into three different <br />types: <br /> <br />Type 1 - <br />Type 2 - <br /> <br />Field surveyed cross-sections used only in the representative reach; <br />Field surveyed cross-sections transferred from a reach with similar <br />characteristics using input parameters specific to the reach in question; <br />Hybrid cross-sections using map-derived data and field observations; <br /> <br />Type 3 - <br /> <br />By using these categories to identify cross-section sources, 8 of the 12 reaches on the Gunnison <br />River were divided into the following groups: <br /> <br />Type 1 Cross-sections - <br />Type 2 Cross-sections - <br />Type 3 Cross-sections - <br /> <br />3 reaches <br />2 reaches <br />3 reaches <br /> <br />There were 4 additional reaches which were classified as follows: 3 canyon reaches for which <br />no cross-sections were developed; I reaach where a detailed study had already been performed. <br /> <br />Table 5 identifies the cross-sections, the group type, and flow values used to calculate the flood <br />depths. The cross-sections, with 50-year and 100-year flood lines illustrated, are presented after <br />c Section 4.4 in Figures 7A-7H. <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.