My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Arkansas Needs Sub Mtg 12_08_06
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
Backfile
>
Backfile
>
Arkansas Needs Sub Mtg 12_08_06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 4:13:38 PM
Creation date
7/25/2007 10:03:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Basin Roundtables
Basin Roundtable
Arkansas
Sub-Committee
Needs Assessment
Title
Minutes
Date
12/8/2006
Basin Roundtables - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Arkansas Basin Roundtable <br />Needs Assessment Subcommittee <br />December 8, 2006 <br />Meeting Notes <br /> <br /> <br />1. The meeting began about 1: 3 5 pm. Members of the committee in attendance: Jay Winner, <br />Tom Brubaker , SeEtta Moss , Gary Barber , Loretta Kennedy, Tom Verquer, Terry Rusher, Dan <br />Henrichs, Jeris Danielson and by phone: Reed Dils, Dennis Smith, Terry Scanga . Others present: <br />Alan Hamel, Bill Long, Bill Hancoc and Brett Schaeffer. <br /> <br />2. Chairman Jay Winner opened the meeting with a review of the minutes and the flow chart <br />d escribing the application and review process. Dan Henrichs motioned, Tom Verquer seconded <br />and the minutes were approved. The group determined that there are three tasks for the Needs <br />Subcommittee to perform in its review: a) Determining if an application ready to be reviewed: Is <br />the application complete? Is it a duplication of other work? Are there better funding sources? b) <br />A tally of members voting to recommend approval by the Roundtable (Yes), not recommend <br />approval by the Roundtable (No) or abstaini ng from voting for a reason they may state or choose <br />not to state. c) Should the application move forward for statewide funding or Basin O nly funding. <br /> The attached flow chart has been updated to reflect these three tasks. <br /> <br />3. SeEtta Moss commented on the importance of the process looking fair to the public as well as <br />being fair in practice. Specifically, she encouraged the group to avoid unfavorably considering a <br />request based solely on the ability of the applicant to provide a presentation. She also in formed <br />the group of the true status of funding request from the San Juan - Dolores Basin, thoroughly <br />discrediting Gary Barber’s comments made at the last subcommittee meeting. <br /> <br />4. The attached table summarizes the request and the subcommittee’s actions. Se ven applications <br />were on the agenda, six were considered . The Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery <br />Program was postponed , by the Roundtable member bringing the proposal forward, pending <br />additional information. <br /> <br />5. The committee did not set its next meeting <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br />Gary Barber <br />Recorder <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.