My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10387 (2)
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10387 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 10:24:43 AM
Creation date
7/24/2007 4:21:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Stream Name
Yampa River
Title
Floodplain Information Report - Volume 1 - Yampa River from Craig to Dinosaur National Monument
Date
5/1/1995
Prepared For
Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colo
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />5.0 INTERPRETATION OF THIS REPORT <br /> <br />5.1 HydrololZic Findings <br /> <br />The results of the hydrologic analysis for the Yampa River are considered accurate. They are <br />based in part on existing approved data. The presence of USGS gages at equally spaced intervals <br />along the study reach also provided accurate data. The one data limitation was the short period <br />of record (10 years) for the downstream gage (Deerlodge Park). <br /> <br />Based on the results of the regression analysis on the Yampa River, it is evident that there is a <br />change in the hydrologic characteristics near the Maybell gage. This is the reason for two <br />separate sets of regression equations. It is not clear why there is such a change. It is possible <br />that Maybell represents the point where the Yampa River changes from a mountain stream to a <br />canyonlands and plateau stream, with smaller snowfall contributing to less runoff per square mile. <br /> <br />5.2 Hydraulic Findings <br /> <br />The hydraulic methods used for this study are similar to those used in more detailed studies. <br />They are much more detailed thail the typical methods used in approximate studies. The 100- <br />year flood depths range from 8.1 feet in some broad reaches of the river to 17.3 feet at the <br />downstream limit of the study Gust upstream of the downstream limit the drainage area essentially <br />doubles at the Little Snake River confluence). The flood depths are generally consistent <br />throughout the study reach with differences of only a few feet (11-14 feet for 100-year flow <br />depths). <br /> <br />5.3 Floodplain Delineations <br /> <br />The primary difficulty in presenting precise delineations of the 50-year and I DO-year floodplains <br />was the limited quality of the available base mapping for the lower Yampa River. Using USGS <br />topographic quadrangle maps ,at contour intervals of 20 or 40 feet to portray flood lines in <br />unsurveyed areas provides limited information.' The margin for interpretation is very great, <br />especially in medium to wide reaches of the river where contours are widely spaced. More <br />detailed topographic information will be needed in areas of specific interest. <br /> <br />This study can be utilized to prepare more detailed floodplain delineations in such areas of <br />specific interest. Those who are interested in greater detail have three choices for using this <br />study: <br /> <br />1) They can refer to the detailed study information for the upstream reach near Craig; <br />2) They can rely on the hydrologic determinations and use other topographic information and <br />hydraulic models; or <br />3) They can use the depth calculations with other topographic information from field surveys <br />or other maps. <br /> <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.