Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />methodology used for computing flood depths at the cross-sections is similar to accepted <br />methodologies used by state and federal agencies in performing detailed analyses, except that <br />there is no balancing of energy from one cross-section to the next. <br /> <br />The four surveyed cross-sections, the six surveyed cross-sections transferred to reaches other than <br />the reach where they were surveyed, and the two cross-sections that were. hybrids of map cross- <br />sections and field data are graphically represented in Figures 7A-M. Example rating curves were <br />prepared for the four field-surveyed cross-sections. They are presented in Plates 11-14, after the <br />floodplain maps. <br /> <br />4.5 Delineating Flood Boundaries <br /> <br />The calculated flood depths for the various stream reaches were first plotted on the quadrangle <br />maps at the cross-section locations. The resulting floodplain widths were compared to the <br />floodplain widths on the cross-section plots. The floodplain boundaries between the cross- <br />sections were then approximated by delineating flood depth contours and interpreting the <br />relationship between those flood depth contours and the ground contours. Consideration was <br />given to the slope within each reach. The fmalized information was displayed on the USGS 7.5' <br />quadrangle maps (scale of 1" = 2,000'). A table identifying the quadrangle maps used in each <br />plate and the map scale is given in Figure 8. The location of each floodplain map plate is shown <br />in Figure 9, and the floodplain maps are shown in Plates 1-10. <br /> <br />19 <br />