Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Stream flow discharge is reduced by underground hydraulic conduits for segments of <br />North Clear Creek and Gregory Gulch. Along North Clear Creek, an 8-foot diameter <br />bypass pipe constructed near the Jacobs Casino was approved by FEMA in LOMR Case <br />No. 98-08-310P (Futura, 1996). During the 100-year flood, the bypass pipe will carry <br />approximatelY'~ 950~cfs, ~and~surface~flows~estimates~are-reduced,by~this-amount.~ ~It~was <br />assumed the pipe carries no discharge during the 500-year event. A closed flume is <br />located in Gregory Street. The Black Hawk FIS indicates the flume can carry 200 cfs <br />during the 100-year event (FEMA, 1984). Flood peaks for the 10-, 50, and 100-year <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />During the 500-year event, it was assumed there is no reservoir storage, and the 500-year <br />flood peak discharges listed in the 1984 FIS have not been changed. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The hydrologic analysis ncorporated storage/discharge curves for Dorothy Lee <br />Reservoir, a detention reservoir in Gregory Gulch, and Chase Gulch Reservoir, a water <br />supply reservoir located in Chase Gulch. Since Chase Gulch Reservoir is used for water <br />supply, it was assumed the reservoir is full and storage of floodwaters occurs only above <br />the spillway. The stage/storage/discharge relationship for Chase Gulch Reservoir was <br />obtained from as-constructed plans on file with the Colorado State Engineer's Office <br />(RMC, 1996). The stage/storage/discharge relationship for Dorothy Lee Reservoir was <br />taken from the Central LOMR (RMC, 1991). <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />North Clear Creek watershed is dominated by Hydrologic Soil Group "D" based on <br />recent NRCS soils mapping (NRCS, 1998). Land use information was obtained from <br />CWCR Land use was subdivided into high density forest, low density forest, meadow, <br />high density residential, low density residential, and commercial. This information was <br />compiled and is shown on Figure 4. Using these data, average curve numbers were <br />calculated for each subcatchment. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The study area was divided into catchments as shown on Figures 3A, 3B, and 3C, <br />Catchment Areas. Design points are defined at various points in the study area and were <br />placed at major confluences and at detention storage areas. Point precipitation estimates <br />for the 24-hour storm were obtained from the NOAA Atlas 2 (Miller et aI., 1973) and are <br />3.3, 3.0, and 2.2 inches for the 100-, 50-, and 10-year storms, respectively, for non- <br />snowfall events. Precipitation distribution used a SCS 24-hour "Type IA" precipitation <br />distribution for North Clear Creek and a SCS 24-hour "Type II" precipitation distribution <br />for Gregory and Chase Gulch. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The update of the hydrologic analysis for North Clear Creek, Gregory Gulch, and Chase <br />Gulch was performed under the direction of CWCB and uses the SCS computer program <br />TR20. The model uses information on precipitation, soils, land use, geometric <br />parameters of the watershed, and hydraulic structures to estimate flood hydro graphs and <br />flood peak discharges. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />H <br /> <br />ENGINEERING METHODS <br /> <br />