My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12515
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12515
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:24 PM
Creation date
7/24/2007 2:54:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.102.01.H
Description
Colorado River - Water Projects - Aspinall Storage Unit - General - Operation Studies
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
8/1/2003
Author
LaGory - Tomasko - Hayse
Title
Evaluating the Effects of Aspinall Unit Release Strategies on Endangered Fish Habitat in the Lower Gunnison River - Draft - 08-01-03
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OOJ3~~5 <br /> <br />Draft - Do Not Cite <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />August 2003 <br /> <br />EVALUATING THE EFFECTS OF ASPINALL UNIT RELEASE STRATEGIES <br />ON ENDANGERED FISH HABITAT IN THE LOWER GUNNISON RIVER <br /> <br />prepared by <br /> <br />Kirk E. LaGory, David Tomasko, and John W. Hayse <br /> <br />Environmental Assessment Division <br />Argonne National Laboratory <br />Argonne, TIlinois <br /> <br />1 INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) recently developed flow recommendations for <br />endangered fishes (Colorado pikeminnow Ptychocheilus lucius, humpback chub Gila cypha, <br />bonytail Gila elegans, and razorback sucker Xyrauchen texanus) that identify critical flows to be <br />achieved in the lower Gunnison and upper Colorado Rivers in Colorado (McAda 2003). <br />Although flow recommendations can be achieved in a variety of ways including changes in <br />diversion rates and release patterns from a number of flow regulation structures, it is likely that <br />the Aspinall Unit (Crystal, Morrow Point, and Blue Mesa Dams) located in the upper Gunnison <br />River, will be called on to provide a majority of the flows needed to meet recommendations <br />because it is the largest regulation structure in this portion of the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />The evaluation presented in this report is intended to determine if and to what extent the <br />use of water at risk of spill1 from the Aspinall Unit could meet FWS flow recommendations. Use <br />of this excess water exclusively to meet the flow recommendations would reduce the impact of <br />the flow recommendations on power and water users and, thus, the effectiveness of using water <br />at risk of spill is of interest. <br /> <br />1 Spilled water is defmed as exce~ water that can not be stored in the Aspinall Unit reseIVoirs because of limited <br />storage capacity relative to inflow and that is greater than the flow-through capacity of the power plants. Spilled <br />water would be released either through bypass structures or spillways. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.