My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12515
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12515
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:24 PM
Creation date
7/24/2007 2:54:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.102.01.H
Description
Colorado River - Water Projects - Aspinall Storage Unit - General - Operation Studies
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
8/1/2003
Author
LaGory - Tomasko - Hayse
Title
Evaluating the Effects of Aspinall Unit Release Strategies on Endangered Fish Habitat in the Lower Gunnison River - Draft - 08-01-03
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Draft - Do Not Cite <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />00Q353 <br /> <br />August 2003 <br /> <br />---. <br /> <br />3.4 HABITAT MAINTENANCE THRESHOLDS <br /> <br />The following sections presents exceedances for flow thresholds considered important for <br />maintenance of endangered fish habitats in the lower Gunnison River under the six flow <br />scenarios 'consideredin this report. Thresholds evaluated and their basis are discussed in <br />Section 2.4. <br /> <br />3.4.1 FWS Flow Recommendations <br /> <br />As presented in Section 2.4.1, FWS flow recommendations consisted of a <br />recommendation of the long-term annual mean munber of days that flow should exceed half- <br />bankfull (8,070 cfs) and b~ flow thresholds (14,350 cfs) each year as well as instantaneous <br />peak flow recommendations in different hyc;lrologic conditions. Recommendations were made <br />for flows in the Gunnison River as measured at "the Grand Junction gage. Each of the six flow <br />scenarios were evaluated to determine how well they met these FWS recommendations. <br /> <br />3.4.1.1 FWS Half-Bankfull and Banldull Recommendations <br /> <br />The number of days per year that flows would exceed half-bankfull conditions (8,070 cfs) <br />at the Grand Junction gage are presented in Table 9 for the six flow scenarios. The long-term <br />means for the periods 1975 through 2000 and 1978 through 1997 are also presented to allow <br />comparison with the FWS flow recommendations (as presented in Table 2). <br /> <br />For dry years (e.g., 1989), none of the flow scenarios would produce flows that exceed <br />the half-bankfull condition. Historically, half-bankfull flows were exceeded from 0 to 74 days. <br />For a very wet year {1984), Western C, Western D, and the Reclamation scenarips exceed the <br />gage flows by 8 days (about 14%). For the 26-year period of record, the Reclamation scenario <br />would have more total days in which flows exceeded half-bankfull conditions (468 days versus <br />420, 445, 452, 439, and 446 days for gage flows, and Western A, Western B, Western C, and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.