My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12515
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1-1000
>
WSP12515
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:16:24 PM
Creation date
7/24/2007 2:54:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.102.01.H
Description
Colorado River - Water Projects - Aspinall Storage Unit - General - Operation Studies
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
8/1/2003
Author
LaGory - Tomasko - Hayse
Title
Evaluating the Effects of Aspinall Unit Release Strategies on Endangered Fish Habitat in the Lower Gunnison River - Draft - 08-01-03
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />000321 <br /> <br />Draft - Do Not Cite <br /> <br />August 2003 <br /> <br />CONTENTS <br /> <br />NOT AnON ............. ..................... ...' ...... ....... .... ...... .......... .............. ......... ... ........... ............. .... ...... vi <br /> <br />3 RESULTS ............................................................................................................................. ...18 <br /> <br />3.1 Maximum And MinimUIIl Flows ., ......... ........... ....... ............... ......... .......... ..... ................18 <br /> <br />3.2 Flow Exceedance ..................................................................................... ...................... .18 <br /> <br />3.3 Sediment Transport...... -............................................................ ...................................... .24 <br /> <br />3.4 Habitat Maintenance Thresholds ..... ............ .......... .......... ....... ..... .................... ...... .........28 <br /> <br />4 CONCLUSIONS.......................................................................................... 0...................... .... .38 <br /> <br />5 REFEREN'CES. ......... ............ ..... ... ..... ... ...... ................... .......... ......... ....... ............. .......... .... ....43 <br /> <br />TABLES <br /> <br />1 Characteristics of release scenarios evaluated. ............... ....................... ....... .......... ................3 <br /> <br />2 FWS flow recommendations for the Gunnison River near Grand Jmction, Colorado ........15 <br /> <br />3 Annual peak flows for the six release scenarios at the USGS gage on the <br />Gunnison River near Delta, Colorado................ ........... .......'.......... ....... ........ ........................19 <br /> <br />4 Annual peak flows for the six release scenarios at the USGS gage on the <br />Gunnison River near Grand Jmction, Colorado...... .... ................. ......... ................. ..............20 <br /> <br />5 Annual minimUIIl flows for the six release scenarios at the USGS gage <br />on the Gunnison River near Delta, Colorado................................... ......... .............. ..............21 <br /> <br />6 Annual minimUIIl flows for the six release scenarios at the USGS gage <br />on the Gunnison River near Grand Junction, Colorado........................................................22 <br /> <br />7 Annual sediment load for release scenarios as calculated using the <br />Pitlick et al. (1999) mode1............... ............ ................................... ......... .................... ...........25 <br /> <br />8 Annual sediment load for release scenarios as calculated using the <br />Van Steeter and Pitlick (1998) modeL..... ............. ......................... ............. ......... ................26 <br /> <br />9 Number of days/year flows would exceed half-bankfull flow in the <br />Gunnison River at the Grand Junction gage for six flow scenarios......................................29 <br /> <br />10 NUIIlber of days/year flows would exceed bankfull flow in the <br />Gunnison River at the Grand Junction Gage for six flow scenarios.....................................31 <br /> <br />iii <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.