Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. 0 ,-;, <br />~---=----=--~---- <br /> <br />xxxi <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />lions of this, asseSSmem that these sQdaJly rGSponsible fUJlctii.)ns, be carried <br />out. The. a'isessme,nt has ilot been able to demonstrate that this would be im- <br />possible under H federal operati'ng authority ,or inherent under unonfedcl'al <br />authority. A federal authority operating withinthe:existirlg legal! instltutiona.lj <br />and public policy environment, woul~, hC)wt~Yer, ha~~e lllany alternatIves' for <br />innovation foreclosed, and 'a confrontatioll of the national and local interests <br />would be inevitable. In all likelihood, the national interest will prevail ~ut the <br />objectives of ,sQCial equity and governmental even-bandedness will not have <br />been s~rved. <br />On the o.Uler hand, ii decision Ior.a nonfed.erm operating authority will <br />il~clf n:quire btea:kiqg .new legal, institutiona:I, and public policy ground. To <br />the (,:xtcnt that the nonfederal operating authority ensure... innovation while <br />the federal operating authority is ,unable to overcome the inertia of existing <br />policy, this assessment recommendS the choice of It nonfedcral operating au- <br />thority. Three alterna~vcs for a nonfederal op(~rating authority were di,scusscd. . <br />His recommend,cd that the states with target areas examine, these authorities to <br />determine the option that appears to be in theit,.best intercst A federally char;- <br />tered corporation is favored by this assessment for 30 operating. program en- <br />compassingse:veral st;1t~. <br />WaSA in the Upper Colorado River Basin is incremental in a,ll aspects <br />except its social impact. The sociaJproblems that it is creating arc out of pro- <br />portion to the physi~al impacts on which they arc based. This does not say that <br />th~y can be ignQrcd because they are based on unrealistic perceptions: They <br />arercal problems and the perceptions are rea] regardless of their subjective <br />basis. <br />In tenns of direct costs, WOSA is the least expensive way of producing <br />augmented wat~r now available. Technicid.ly, it.k a reversible system; it can <br />b~ turned on. and off at will and it requires only minimal distlirbance of ~le <br />physical ,surroundings. In contrilst. the institptions t~at would'be cr.ctlted in <br />(:xpectation of the water pro(luced -are nOl reversib]c~ They entail a commit- <br />ment of reSources that. to some extent could not be transferred elsewhere. if <br />the augmented water were not produced. The alllount of wat~r produced, <br />whiIe.significam. will only brin.g the average virg.in fl<;iw qf the river from its <br />reCent level to something like the l()l1g termval.ue civer- it.!!measUl."oo history. <br />The water produced will probably not be .sufficicnt on the average to <br />accommo<iiue the Mexican Water Treaty obligation if evaporation los.ses are <br />considered. The improvement of water quality will he snlall. The be.nC!1tS to <br />be reaHzed from the uses. to which the W3.terinight be:put are marginal, and <br />the economic impact QIl the are-a of origin froni the increased snowpack is <br />relatively small. At the. nationa.llcvel, the.cconomic:impacr. is insignificant The <br />environmental impact is incremental, ,and exc.ept for the introdi.1~tion of silver <br />iodide into the environment, no new effects arccre3ted.. Th.e effects now ex- <br />perienced wiU b~ intensified, and the.re may be some compounding of effects. <br />Because .of the great yearly variation in .snowpack, together wi'th the- kmg <br />term-cyclic variations in' weather that seem to apply, it can safely be s~id that <br />if the ,same effects resulting from \VaSA were to begin to appear n~turally, <br /> <br />i <br />i I <br /> <br />,---1 .- --____. <br />