Laserfiche WebLink
· Better to use 1177 process to determine compact call administration than <br />traditional SEO rule making <br /> <br /> <br />SUGGESTIONS TO CWCB ON S B 122 <br />· Active, early round table involvement <br />· Recognize time constraints but open involvement <br />· Must end up with usable results, data, policy recommendations <br />· Recognize variability, What is the supply? <br />· Round tables need written materials to review <br />· Use wa ter conservation districts for communication and involvement between <br />round tables and CWCB and as technical advisors to round tables <br />· Compact call rulemaking should not occur until after SB 122 study conclusion <br />· 122 should be supply - only oriented <br />· Must con sider 2000 - 2007 drought data <br />· West Slope at greater risk at compact call <br />· Analysis must include broad range of water scenarios and possible specific <br />outcomes <br />· Need to consider how stored water (e.g., CRSP reservoirs) can reduce risk <br />· T & E species’ needs included <br />· Study must address issue of risk <br />· Need consumptive use data of pre - 1922 water rights <br />· Need to include climate change risk assessment <br />· Look at situation where one sub - basin maybe excessively dry when another sub - <br />basin is wet <br />· Recognize that inform al water sharing practices not reflected in water right <br />tabulations <br />· Examine maximum diversions from existing infrastructure <br />· Outcome likely to be ranges or scenarios associated with different levels of risk, <br />not single number <br />· Study must have common and a ccepted platform <br />· Consensus on process and data as important as consensus on outcome <br />· Criteria and guidelines process worked pretty well with round tables <br />· Process and results to round tables first; IBCC less important <br />· Need scenarios examining compact cal l under various ways of administering <br />compact call <br />