My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ02181
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
0001-1000
>
PROJ02181
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2010 11:19:17 AM
Creation date
7/19/2007 12:23:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
FS0014X
Contractor Name
Southern High Plains Ground Water Management DistrictSouthern High Plains Ground Water Management Di
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Baca
Prowers
Las Animas
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />4.0 WELL DATA BASE ANALYSIS <br /> <br />4.1 WELL RECORDS <br />The 1967 Beck Report states there were approximately 1,020 active wells registered <br />with the State Engineers Office (SEO) by 1966. The records of the SEO were reviewed <br />and updated from the August 1999 list used in the 1999 Feasibility Study by MWE, with <br />the assistance of staff from the SEO. Based upon the updated records, there are <br />approximately 2,600 registered and permitted wells in the Basin as of May 2000. These <br />wells are shown on Map 1 and are separated into respective well types. Of this total, <br />approximately 1,300 wells are considered high-capacity wells (Le., they are permitted to <br />produce water at rates greater than 50 gpm). The remaining 1,300 wells are considered <br />small capacity wells because they are permitted to produce less than 50 gpm. Table 4-1 <br />provides a summary of the 2,600 wells based on permitted use and their classification <br />either as a large or small capacity well. Appendix A contains a list of permitted wells in <br />the Basin that was obtained from the SEO. <br /> <br />4.2 WELL LOGS <br />To achieve the stated goals No.2, 3, and 6 in Section 2.0, selected logs of permitted <br />wells were carefully reviewed and analyzed by MWE staff geologist. A series of geologic <br />cross sections with composite ground-water levels were created and are depicted in <br />Map 2. The cross sections are presented and described in Section 9. Using the cross- <br />section information, major hydrostratigraphic units and aquifers in the Basin were <br />identified and are described in Sections 7 and 8, respectively. The cross sections were <br />also instrumental in creating aquifer structure-contour and saturated thickness maps <br />(Maps 9 and 10). <br /> <br />4.3 MONITOR WELL LOCATION AND SELECTION <br />Crop irrigation is significant in most of the townships of the District. However, ground- <br />water levels are not monitored in many of these high-irrigation townships. Map 2 also <br />shows the location of 83 high-capacity wells that are monitored annually (in January <br />through March) to measure and record water-level information within the District. These <br />wells are listed in Table 4-2 with associated location, aquifer and water-level information. <br />These wells are located. on Map 3 along with other wells used to define the various <br />hydrostratigraphic units and aquifers. <br /> <br />Table 4-3 lists the number of monitor wels, irrigation wells, and total number of wells for <br />each township in the District. This table also identifies those townships where additional <br />monitoring wells would be useful. Map 4 provides a visual assessment of the same <br />data. <br /> <br />IV-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.