Laserfiche WebLink
<br />i' ~ <br />- I <br />.' <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />_.._.o."",~ <br /> <br />I <br />) <br /> <br /> <br />The government takes <br />another look at <br />vveather modification <br /> <br />BY ANDREW FREEDMAN <br /> <br />fter years oflittle interest and very little funding, Congress <br />is exploring steps to put the federal government back <br />in the weather modification business. Bills currently <br />pending in both the House and Senate would estab~ <br />lish a federal coordinating committee on weather <br />modification research for studying the possibility of modifying weather <br />for human benefit, such as seeding clouds to boost water supplies. <br />A failure to live up to past promises and controversy over potential <br />legal problems have plagued this often maligned branch of meteorol~ <br />ogy. In the 1950s and 60s, researchers were overly confident of their <br />ability to beneficially alter precipitation patterns, disrupt hailstorms, <br />and reduce fearsome hurricanes to harmless rainstorms. The belief <br />that man could shape the weather even led to a 1977 United Nations <br />Treaty, forbidding the use of weather modification as a weapon of war. <br />The United States is a parry to that treaty, but it doesn't apply in cases <br />of "benign weather modification." <br /> <br /> <br />24 WEATHERWISE. JULY I AUGUST 2006 <br />